2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative experimental determination of evaporation influencing factors in single droplet levitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 The comparison of the flow velocity vectors in the surrounding of droplets at different aspect ratios revealed that the gas velocity and the mean incident flow velocity in front of the droplet surface increased with a higher aspect ratio. 36 In our experiment, with the droplet evaporating, the aspect ratio of the oblate droplet was increasing and this indicated that the flow field effect around the droplet was enhanced. In this case, the synthesized ZIF-8 of smaller particle Paper PCCP size also verified the effect of ultrasound in acoustically levitated droplets.…”
Section: Paper Pccpmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 The comparison of the flow velocity vectors in the surrounding of droplets at different aspect ratios revealed that the gas velocity and the mean incident flow velocity in front of the droplet surface increased with a higher aspect ratio. 36 In our experiment, with the droplet evaporating, the aspect ratio of the oblate droplet was increasing and this indicated that the flow field effect around the droplet was enhanced. In this case, the synthesized ZIF-8 of smaller particle Paper PCCP size also verified the effect of ultrasound in acoustically levitated droplets.…”
Section: Paper Pccpmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Y. Sasaki, M. Junk et al measured the flow field around the acoustically levitated water droplets by particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) and particle image velocimetry (PIV). 35,36 The inner acoustic streaming was located at the surface boundary, while the outer acoustic streaming was represented by the toroidal vortices. The droplet external flow field direction was toward the droplet, with a circulating vortex forming near the droplet surface.…”
Section: Paper Pccpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, ω is the angular frequency of the sound vibration, D g i is the mass diffusion coefficient of the component i in the gas phase, and B i = A 0e,i /ρ 0 c 0 is an acoustic velocity scale of component i, where A 0e,i , ρ 0 , c 0 are the effective pressure amplitude of the acoustic field, unperturbed gas density and the sound velocity. The effective pressure amplitude A 0e,i will significantly affect the evaporation rate of the droplet according to Junk et al (2020), which can also be derived from (3.9). We have maintained a stable value of A 0e in our experiments, which can be obtained via (5.6) in Yarin et al (1998) through obtaining the critical levitator power for dropout: A 0e,w = 5521 N m −2 for water, and A 0e,e = 5850 N m −2 for ethanol.…”
Section: Heat and Mass Transfer Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Junk et al [53] studied experimentally the evaporation of single droplet levitation. They studied different parameters such as droplet deformation, temperature, and surrounding flow field.…”
Section: Levitated Dropletmentioning
confidence: 99%