Retina 2006
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-02598-0.50058-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Fluorescein Angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 233 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 18 Selection of the frame based on degree of intravascular fluorescence (as in the current study) is considered better compared to frame selected on absolute time as the latter may be influenced by factors such as rapidity of injection and vascular anatomy. 12 Another study of intravitreal bevacizumab reported a significant reduction in GLD on FA at 3 months using incorporated measuring software (ImageNet 2000; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan). 16 None of these studies analyzed segmented images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 18 Selection of the frame based on degree of intravascular fluorescence (as in the current study) is considered better compared to frame selected on absolute time as the latter may be influenced by factors such as rapidity of injection and vascular anatomy. 12 Another study of intravitreal bevacizumab reported a significant reduction in GLD on FA at 3 months using incorporated measuring software (ImageNet 2000; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan). 16 None of these studies analyzed segmented images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to nonsegmented image analysis, a digital image processing strategy through FA image feature segmentation provides a better opportunity. 12 The purpose of our study was to identify quantitative parameters for CNV lesions on segmented FA images and to correlate these with treatment outcome. In this study, pretreatment and posttreatment segmented FA images were analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous publications reported different methods for retinal lesions size quantification on black-white photos recorded during FA, RF examination, scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, etc. Some authors measured in millimeters or pixels the retinal lesions greatest linear dimension GLD -GLD [mm] or GLD[pix] [5,14,19,[22][23][24][25]. The retinal lesions mouse-driven delimited area (mdrdA) was quantified in total number of pixels -A[tpix] [7,[26][27][28][29][30] in MPS or DA units after defining the optic nerve head (ONH) area as a standard MPS or DA unit -A[MPS] or A[DA] [5,14,20,22,23,25,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors measured in millimeters or pixels the retinal lesions greatest linear dimension GLD -GLD [mm] or GLD[pix] [5,14,19,[22][23][24][25]. The retinal lesions mouse-driven delimited area (mdrdA) was quantified in total number of pixels -A[tpix] [7,[26][27][28][29][30] in MPS or DA units after defining the optic nerve head (ONH) area as a standard MPS or DA unit -A[MPS] or A[DA] [5,14,20,22,23,25,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Other methods expressed the retinal lesions area in mm 2 A[mm 2 ] after the approximation of ONH diameter as 1.5mm or 1.8mm, consequently, the ONH area being 1.77mm 2 or 2.54mm 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation