2009
DOI: 10.1080/01431160802395276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative forest canopy structure assessment using an inverted geometric‐optical model and up‐scaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It reveals that PT is a key factor to determine the canopy reflectance. The previous studies used to combine ZT and ZG as one shadowed component [14], [22]. 6.…”
Section: Comparison With the Observed Canopy Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It reveals that PT is a key factor to determine the canopy reflectance. The previous studies used to combine ZT and ZG as one shadowed component [14], [22]. 6.…”
Section: Comparison With the Observed Canopy Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Li-Strahler model is a pioneer GO model in describing the bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) of canopy using the area ratios of the four scene components. The model has been widely used for retrieving canopy parameters [14], such as leaf area index (LAI). However, the model may lead uncertainties in BRF modeling because the sunlight and view angles rather than the complex canopy structure are better considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, physical models have been used for CC estimation more successfully in other biomes (e.g. Jasinski 1996, Woodcock et al 1997, Zeng et al 2009).…”
Section: Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, identifying individual species reliably using satellite-based and aerial imagery is challenging due to the difficulties of choosing and detecting optimal spectral wavelengths to differentiate the target species from others (which may only be possible at certain times of year), and controlling for the effects of vegetation structural characteristics (Chopping, 2011;Kempeneers et al, 2008;Pisek et al, 2011;Zeng et al, 2009) as well as identifying spatial associations between invasive and closely-related native species (Call and Nilsen, 2003). A number of invasive species have also been identified based on the uniqueness in leaf chemistry using both hyperspectral (Asner et al, 2008, Hestir et al, 2008Somers and Asner, 2013b) and multispectral (Becker et al, 2013;Schneider and Fernando, 2010) analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%