1983
DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300021492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative genetics and the evolution of ontogeny: I. Ontogenetic changes in quantitative genetic variance components in randombred mice

Abstract: We report the results of an ontogenetic analysis of quantitative genetic variance components with two replicates drawn from the randombred ICR strain of mice. A total of 432 mice from 108 full-sib families raised in a cross-fostering design were used to estimate direct effects heritability, maternal effects, and environmental effects for weight, head length, trunk length, trunk circumference, and tail length at 17, 24, 31, 38, 45, 52, 59, and 66 days of age. There was no significant difference in heritability … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
1
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the downward bias of the static allometric slope due to measurement error should be on the order of 1%-2% (Hansen and Bartoszek 2012) and should not strongly affect differences between ontogenetic and static allometry as well as the changes in static allometry during ontogeny. For the mouse data, the repeatability of the trunk length was relatively high (0.9 on average) but tended to decrease in the measurements done at an older age (table 3 in Cheverud et al 1983). This could generate a downward bias of the static allometric slope of ∼10% during ontogeny.…”
Section: Choice Of the Regression Model And Measurement Errormentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the downward bias of the static allometric slope due to measurement error should be on the order of 1%-2% (Hansen and Bartoszek 2012) and should not strongly affect differences between ontogenetic and static allometry as well as the changes in static allometry during ontogeny. For the mouse data, the repeatability of the trunk length was relatively high (0.9 on average) but tended to decrease in the measurements done at an older age (table 3 in Cheverud et al 1983). This could generate a downward bias of the static allometric slope of ∼10% during ontogeny.…”
Section: Choice Of the Regression Model And Measurement Errormentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The first data set comprises data on ontogenetic allometry of the caudal fin length collected on female guppies (Poecilia reticulata) from three different populations maintained in captivity. The second data set comprises data on ontogenetic allometry of head length and tail length of mice (Mus musculus) bred in captivity (Cheverud et al 1983;Cheverud and Leamy 1985). These organisms differ in their growth pattern, fish having indeterminate growth while the growth of mice ceases after ∼12 weeks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, females may influence offspring phenotype and survival through mate choice, selection of oviposition sites and offspring provisioning (for reviews see : Bernardo 1996;Mousseau & Fox 1998a). Maternal effects generally have their greatest impact early in development and then decline as offspring mature (Cheverud et al 1983;Price 1998;. However, because mortality and thus selection are often greatest during early development (Rossiter 1996), even maternal effects of short duration may have important evolutionary consequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Асимметрия отдельных признаков или их комплекса оценивается для особи, находящейся на определенной стадии развития, а для ее органов -в конкретный период морфогенеза. Однако в зависимости от возраста или стадии морфогенеза величина и изменчивость многих признаков может значительно меняться, так же как само качество особи со временем не остается постоянным (Cheverud et al, 1983;Leung, Forbes, 1997;.…”
unclassified