2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Genome-Wide Genetic Interaction Screens Reveal Global Epistatic Relationships of Protein Complexes in Escherichia coli

Abstract: Large-scale proteomic analyses in Escherichia coli have documented the composition and physical relationships of multiprotein complexes, but not their functional organization into biological pathways and processes. Conversely, genetic interaction (GI) screens can provide insights into the biological role(s) of individual gene and higher order associations. Combining the information from both approaches should elucidate how complexes and pathways intersect functionally at a systems level. However, such integrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
91
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
5
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surviving mutants were recovered from these animals and the relative representation of each transposon mutant was compared between the WT and ctpC::hyg libraries to generate a map of 181 aggravating or alleviating mutations (Figure 1A–C). This number of interacting genes was consistent with that observed for highly-connected “hub” genes in S. cerevisiae and E. coli genetic interaction maps, and our previous GI studies in Mtb (Babu et al, 2014; Costanzo et al, 2010; Griffin et al, 2011; Joshi et al, 2006). Among the previously recognized ROS detoxification systems, the peroxiredoxin, ahpE , showed the strongest interaction with ctpC (Table S1), whereas weaker and statistically non-significant interactions were found with katG and ahpCD .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Surviving mutants were recovered from these animals and the relative representation of each transposon mutant was compared between the WT and ctpC::hyg libraries to generate a map of 181 aggravating or alleviating mutations (Figure 1A–C). This number of interacting genes was consistent with that observed for highly-connected “hub” genes in S. cerevisiae and E. coli genetic interaction maps, and our previous GI studies in Mtb (Babu et al, 2014; Costanzo et al, 2010; Griffin et al, 2011; Joshi et al, 2006). Among the previously recognized ROS detoxification systems, the peroxiredoxin, ahpE , showed the strongest interaction with ctpC (Table S1), whereas weaker and statistically non-significant interactions were found with katG and ahpCD .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The group of M. Babu has applied this approach to E. coli (138,139), and their findings support our proposed DMSO reductase maturation pathway. Specifically, the work suggests that protein homeostasis groups together the roles of chaperoning, protein folding, and proteases.…”
Section: Expert Opinionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Recently, a genome-wide genetic interaction screen revealed possible functional associations between components of the Suf pathway and the RavA-ViaA ATPase complex, in addition to products of the ynjABCDEFI genes that currently lack annotations to specific cellular pathways (41). Further studies are needed to establish what role these additional factors may play in the regulation of Suf and in maintaining Fe-S cluster homeostasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%