2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2009
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2009.5417700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative geometric calibration & validation of the Rapideye constellation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RapidEye constellation was launched in 2008 and consists of five identical satellites that allow an up to daily acquisition of multispectral images (5 bands in the visible to near infrared) with a spatial resolution of 6.5 m. Basic preprocessing had already been applied to the purchased L3A data, including radiometric, sensor and geometric corrections, as well as on-board spacecraft corrections [58]. Both RapidEye and Landsat TM data were geometrically resampled to a common 20 m grid used in the simulations.…”
Section: Parameter Retrieval From Earth Observation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RapidEye constellation was launched in 2008 and consists of five identical satellites that allow an up to daily acquisition of multispectral images (5 bands in the visible to near infrared) with a spatial resolution of 6.5 m. Basic preprocessing had already been applied to the purchased L3A data, including radiometric, sensor and geometric corrections, as well as on-board spacecraft corrections [58]. Both RapidEye and Landsat TM data were geometrically resampled to a common 20 m grid used in the simulations.…”
Section: Parameter Retrieval From Earth Observation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the external angle element and line element are strongly correlated, we only take the attitude measurement error into account and treat the orbit measurement error as a part of the attitude measurement error.) In a single scene of image the attitude measurement error can be considered as a constant, whereas there is a degree of random deviation between different scenes of images acquired at different times [2]. Meanwhile, it is noteworthy that, as a scene-dependent random error, it is impossible to distinguish the attitude measurement error from the camera installation angle error using a single scene of an image.…”
Section: Attitude Measurement Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is common for earth-observation satellite programs to calibrate the alignment during the initial commissioning period [2,3,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. However, it is difficult to obtain an accurate alignment because the alignment error is measured as the sum of various error sources [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers tried an automatic GCP extraction technique using reference ortho-photos and image-based feature matching to get a much higher number of GCPs [12][13][14]21,22]. Robertson et al even included the automated GCP extraction step to RapidEye's ground processing chain for alignment calibration [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation