2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative In Situ Measurement of Estrogen Receptor mRNA Predicts Response to Tamoxifen

Abstract: PurposeQuantification of mRNA has historically been done by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Recently, a robust method of detection of mRNA utilizing in situ hybridization has been described that is linear and shows high specificity with low background. Here we describe the use of the AQUA method of quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) for measuring mRNA in situ using ESR1 (the estrogen receptor alpha gene) in breast cancer to determine its predictive value compared to Estrogen Recept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference might be explained, at least in part, by the distinct properties and independent information provided by PD-L1 protein and mRNA molecules, as reported (33). Methodologic differences might also account for the apparent inconsistency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The difference might be explained, at least in part, by the distinct properties and independent information provided by PD-L1 protein and mRNA molecules, as reported (33). Methodologic differences might also account for the apparent inconsistency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…15 In one study, in situ RNA detection was not measurable in tissues prior to 1993. 16 DNA is thought to be most stable, but recent whole exome sequencing efforts in our group have noted increased specimen failure with age. Further understanding of age-dependent loss of biomarker information could also depend on storage conditions and other pre-analytic variables that can be optimized for signal preservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Patient cohorts, tissue microarrays, and control preparations Two previously reported (33,34) retrospective stage I-III breast cancer collections from Yale University (New Haven, CT) represented in tissue microarray (TMA) format were used in this study, termed YTMA128 (N ¼ 238) and YTMA201 (N ¼ 398). Clinicopathologic information from patients in both cohorts was collected from clinical records and pathology reports.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ detection of PD-L1 transcripts in FFPE TMA samples was performed using the RNAscope assay with custom-designed in situ hybridization probes (Advanced Cell Diagnostics) coupled to automated quantitative fluorescence (QIF) detection as described (33)(34)(35). Briefly, 5 mm sections were deparaffinized, boiled with preamplification reagent for 15 minutes, and submitted to protease digestion followed by hybridization for 2 hours with target probes to human PD-L1 mRNA, Ubiquitin C (UbC) as a positive control, or the bacterial gene DapB mRNA as a negative control.…”
Section: In Situ Mrna Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%