2023
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2022.1031218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative interpretation of coal industrial components using a gray system and geophysical logging data: A case study from the Qinshui Basin, China

Abstract: The content of industrial components of coalbeds, one of the main parameters of coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs, is crucial in the entire coal mine resource exploration and exploitation process. Currently, using geophysical logging data to determine the content of industrial components is the most widely implemented method. In this study, the PZ block in the Qinshui Basin was employed as a target block to evaluate ash (Aad), fixed carbon (FCad), volatile matter (Vdaf), and moisture (Mad) under the air-dry (AD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 14, the logging data correspond to the radial direction (Figure 14a), while the core resistivity is vertical (Figure 14b); that is, there is a difference of 90 • between the simulation results and the response of logging data. For the response of logging data, taking a single fracture as an example, the resistivity response increases with the increase in fracture angle, and the corresponding core resistivity is a low-angle fracture, which is also consistent [33]. For the solution of fracture angle, many scholars use dual laterolog data.…”
Section: The Difference Between Core Resistivity and Logging Resistivitymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…As shown in Figure 14, the logging data correspond to the radial direction (Figure 14a), while the core resistivity is vertical (Figure 14b); that is, there is a difference of 90 • between the simulation results and the response of logging data. For the response of logging data, taking a single fracture as an example, the resistivity response increases with the increase in fracture angle, and the corresponding core resistivity is a low-angle fracture, which is also consistent [33]. For the solution of fracture angle, many scholars use dual laterolog data.…”
Section: The Difference Between Core Resistivity and Logging Resistivitymentioning
confidence: 63%