1995
DOI: 10.1118/1.597462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative mammography contrast threshold test tool

Abstract: Mammographic contrast is commonly evaluated by visualizing small objects of varying size or mass divided by projected area. These qualitative contrast determinations are commonly performed by imaging a phantom like the American College of Radiology accreditation phantom at clinical mammographic settings. However, this contrast assessment does not take into account the kVp of the machine. This work describes a quantitative mammography contrast threshold test tool which examines light object contrast on a unifor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of using mass artefacts is to provide a measurement of the low-contrast sensitivity of the mammography systems, which is relevant to the detection of tumour masses (round blobs) within the breast. Scoring small objects of varying size is a commonly used method to evaluate contrast in mammography units [23] . The use of dark targets (air gaps of varying depths) on a uniform background (plastic) to measure image contrast has previously been used [18] .…”
Section: Tumour (Masses) Simulation In the Apg Phantommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aim of using mass artefacts is to provide a measurement of the low-contrast sensitivity of the mammography systems, which is relevant to the detection of tumour masses (round blobs) within the breast. Scoring small objects of varying size is a commonly used method to evaluate contrast in mammography units [23] . The use of dark targets (air gaps of varying depths) on a uniform background (plastic) to measure image contrast has previously been used [18] .…”
Section: Tumour (Masses) Simulation In the Apg Phantommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to produce a light target on a uniform background, the target can be thicker than that of the background or the attenuation coefficient of the target can be greater than that of the background [23] . Tissue equivalent materials have been used to obtain information on image quality, dose and overall system performance.…”
Section: Tumour (Masses) Simulation In the Apg Phantommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A análise dos limites de detecção de nódulos tem sido limitada, até o presente momento, pela ausência de dados experimentais de coeficientes de atenuação linear de tecidos mamários neoplásicos na faixa de energia da mamografia. Assim, as estimativas destes limites são escassas na literatura, sendo que os estudos experimentais realizados até o momento utilizam materiais equivalentes, simulando apenas objetos presentes em uma mama de composição média (Wagner e Frey 1995, Del Guerra et al 2002. De forma geral, os limites de detecção para nódulos obtidos teoricamente neste trabalho concordam com os estimativas experimentais apresentadas por Wagner e Frey (1995) e por Del Guerra et al (2002).…”
Section: Mamografia Convencionalunclassified
“…According to the European Guidelines for quality control in digital mammography, mammographic image quality is expressed in terms of threshold contrast visibility using clinical exposure settings (van Engen et al, 2006, Young et al, 2006a, Young et al, 2006b. The threshold contrast is defined as the lowest contrast value for which the objects are visible (Wagner and Frey, 1995). The contrast-detail mammography (CDMAM) phantom is commonly used for the contrast-detail analysis (Thomas et al, 2005).…”
Section: Contrast-detail Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between contrast and thickness is given by C(t)=100•(1-e -µt ) (%), where µ is the linear attenuation coefficient of gold (µ=0.145 µm -1 in this study). This relationship is extracted from the contrast equation ΔI/I=log e (ψ o /ψ b ) where ψ o is the target energy flux and ψ b is the background energy flux (Wagner and Frey, 1995). To determine the threshold gold thickness for a given disk diameter a psychometric curve is fitted to the data Thijssen, 1996 andVeldkamp et al, 2003):…”
Section: Netherlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%