1985
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/65.2.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Measure of Cutaneous Sensation

Abstract: This study was performed to assess two-point discrimination ability for skin areas of the face and trunk. Using a compass-type instrument, I determined two-point discrimination values for three areas on the face and eight, nonoverlapping regions of the neck and trunk in a sample of 43 healthy young adult men and women. Mean values for the face ranged from 14.9 mm over the eyebrow to 10.4 mm along the lateral aspect of the mandible. Values for the neck and trunk ranged from 35.2 mm for skin of the lateral neck … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, while previously the minimum experienced tactile distance was 2 cm, here it was 4 cm. This change was introduced in order to make sure that tactile distances were clearly suprathreshold at both body locations ( Nolan, 1982 , 1985 ), following the suggestion made by Canzoneri et al (2013a , b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, while previously the minimum experienced tactile distance was 2 cm, here it was 4 cm. This change was introduced in order to make sure that tactile distances were clearly suprathreshold at both body locations ( Nolan, 1982 , 1985 ), following the suggestion made by Canzoneri et al (2013a , b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were presented at two different body locations, the participant’s right forearm (test stimuli) and the forehead (reference stimuli; see Canzoneri et al, 2013a , b , for similar procedure). The minimum distance of 4 cm was chosen to be clearly suprathreshold at both body locations ( Nolan, 1982 , 1985 ). Each tactile contact lasted for approximately 1 s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every project is a new invention, using the knowledge from previous work, but always solving new challenges in new ways. In Experiment 2 we focused on sensations felt on the hand as this would make differences between conditions more noticeable, given the higher tactile sensitivity of hands as compared to other body parts (Nolan, 1982(Nolan, , 1985. Hence, future work should investigate the transferability of our results and concept from hand to whole body tactile stimulation and to the inner part of clothing, as well as investigating the potential use of electrocutaneous stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future versions of this prototype should be really tight and close to the body, potentially having different versions for different body sizes. For Experiment 2, we decided to stimulate the hands, as these would make differences between vibration patterns more noticeable, given their higher sensitivity as compared to other body parts (Nolan, 1982(Nolan, , 1985. Hands are also a relevant body part in relation to clothing-think for instance in gloves-and etextiles are often experienced with the hands.…”
Section: As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation