2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative measurement of gas hold-up distribution in a stirred chemical reactor using X-ray cone-beam computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that bubbles formed a distribution such that the larger bubbles were in a region outside the impeller sh·eam and were up to four times larger than the bubbles entrai ned in the impeller stream. More specifically, gas in these setups would concentrate about the impeller shaft, impeller tip, and within the radial area between the impeller and reactor walls [29,41]. These observations were made for an axial system, but are very similar to those made by Stenberg and Andersson [35] for a single Rushtontype turbine (1 RT) setup, which produced a similar qualitative mass transfer behavior for these impeller types.…”
Section: Figure 2: Effects Of Multiple Impellers On Gas-liquid Mass Tsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…They concluded that bubbles formed a distribution such that the larger bubbles were in a region outside the impeller sh·eam and were up to four times larger than the bubbles entrai ned in the impeller stream. More specifically, gas in these setups would concentrate about the impeller shaft, impeller tip, and within the radial area between the impeller and reactor walls [29,41]. These observations were made for an axial system, but are very similar to those made by Stenberg and Andersson [35] for a single Rushtontype turbine (1 RT) setup, which produced a similar qualitative mass transfer behavior for these impeller types.…”
Section: Figure 2: Effects Of Multiple Impellers On Gas-liquid Mass Tsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The resulting image cube is of 750 × 750 × 500 pixels size with voxels of 70 lm edge length. A detailed description of the system and measurement procedure as well as the data processing can be found elsewhere [48,49]. Fig.…”
Section: X-ray Microtomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high resolution images show the liquid accumulation regions in the packing material. Further Boden et al (2008) could get 3D images by using X-ray tomography, in which the single voxel size was as low as 200 mm. In other cases the resolution of few millimeters is common (Azzi et al, 1991;Roy et al, 2004;Yin et al, 2002).…”
Section: Liquid Distribution In Packed Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%