Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Learning assistants (LAs) play a pivotal role in transforming traditional physics instruction toward a more inquiry-oriented approach. While empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of LA-involved physics instruction, there is a research gap regarding the specific competencies of LAs that contribute to improved conceptual understanding. One conjectured reason is LAs’ inquiry-oriented pedagogical skills, like questioning, which engender more effective interactions with students at points of instructional needs. This study addresses the gap by constructing a model delineating the contribution of LAs’ competencies of questioning, referred to as pedagogical content knowledge in questioning (PCK-Q), to students’ conceptual learning in introductory classical mechanics and electromagnetism. The participants included an instructional team comprising instructors, graduate teaching assistants, and LAs, and students from two sections over two semesters. PCK-Q was measured using a prevalidated instrument of free-response questions from our previous study, which could predict LAs’ questioning practices. Employing a pre-post design, students’ learning gain in conceptual understanding and critical thinking was assessed, and separate models were constructed to explore the relationship between LAs’ PCK-Q and students’ learning gain. Findings suggest that LAs’ PCK-Q has a significant but slight impact on students’ conceptual learning, with little impact on critical thinking. Furthermore, we developed Likert-scale questions, derived equations to quantify PCK-Q from Likert-scale ratings, verified the feasibility of this streamlined approach in measuring LAs’ PCK-Q, and discussed its limitations. The implications of the research findings are discussed in the context of physics instruction and LA preparation. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Learning assistants (LAs) play a pivotal role in transforming traditional physics instruction toward a more inquiry-oriented approach. While empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of LA-involved physics instruction, there is a research gap regarding the specific competencies of LAs that contribute to improved conceptual understanding. One conjectured reason is LAs’ inquiry-oriented pedagogical skills, like questioning, which engender more effective interactions with students at points of instructional needs. This study addresses the gap by constructing a model delineating the contribution of LAs’ competencies of questioning, referred to as pedagogical content knowledge in questioning (PCK-Q), to students’ conceptual learning in introductory classical mechanics and electromagnetism. The participants included an instructional team comprising instructors, graduate teaching assistants, and LAs, and students from two sections over two semesters. PCK-Q was measured using a prevalidated instrument of free-response questions from our previous study, which could predict LAs’ questioning practices. Employing a pre-post design, students’ learning gain in conceptual understanding and critical thinking was assessed, and separate models were constructed to explore the relationship between LAs’ PCK-Q and students’ learning gain. Findings suggest that LAs’ PCK-Q has a significant but slight impact on students’ conceptual learning, with little impact on critical thinking. Furthermore, we developed Likert-scale questions, derived equations to quantify PCK-Q from Likert-scale ratings, verified the feasibility of this streamlined approach in measuring LAs’ PCK-Q, and discussed its limitations. The implications of the research findings are discussed in the context of physics instruction and LA preparation. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.