1980
DOI: 10.1080/01615440.1980.9955247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Methods or Quantum Meruit? Tactics for Early American Legal History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together, these studies suggest that court records merit closer attention in historical research on crime. Although this reflects a sentiment also expressed by others (Beattie 1972;Hindus and Jones 1980), no study has examined the utility of indictment and conviction statistics available from nineteenthcentury U.S. courts.…”
Section: Research Strategymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Together, these studies suggest that court records merit closer attention in historical research on crime. Although this reflects a sentiment also expressed by others (Beattie 1972;Hindus and Jones 1980), no study has examined the utility of indictment and conviction statistics available from nineteenthcentury U.S. courts.…”
Section: Research Strategymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Elsewhere the author laid out guidelines for the quantification of court records. 13 More important here, he approaches his subject in a thoroughly quantitative way. His two variables are the treatment of crime in post-revolutionary Massachusetts and South Carolina.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%