2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2022.108843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative metrics for evaluating reactive cyclic distillation performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure drop profiles at the end of VFP are shown in Figure . From Figure , the stage pressure drops in this study are around 2–3 kPa, close to the pressure drop specified in Rasmussen et al’s studies, , suggesting that the correlations used in this study can approximately estimate the cyclic distillation tray pressure drop. In addition, compared with continuous distillation, the pressure drop of cyclic distillation is relatively large, indicating that stage pressure drops that affect the column temperature and relative volatility of components should not be neglected.…”
Section: Case Studysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pressure drop profiles at the end of VFP are shown in Figure . From Figure , the stage pressure drops in this study are around 2–3 kPa, close to the pressure drop specified in Rasmussen et al’s studies, , suggesting that the correlations used in this study can approximately estimate the cyclic distillation tray pressure drop. In addition, compared with continuous distillation, the pressure drop of cyclic distillation is relatively large, indicating that stage pressure drops that affect the column temperature and relative volatility of components should not be neglected.…”
Section: Case Studysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The studies on the rigorous design/optimization of cyclic distillation are even fewer. Rasmussen et al , in their later studies extended their model to reactive cyclic distillation and used a trial-and-error method to find designs that satisfy product purity requirements. Yet, this heuristic method aggravates the total computational expense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings revealed that the cyclic operation had a beneficial impact on the stage performance within the reactive section as a result of decreased back mixing, resulting in improved separation efficiency. Rasmussen et al 185 introduced three quantitative metrics to assess CCD performance: distance from equilibrium (indicating how quickly chemical equilibrium is achieved during the vapor flow period), the total production over a cycle, and the mean Damköhler number over a cycle. These metrics were employed in three case studies for the production of methyl acetate, MTBE and DME, and the mean Damköhler number over a cycle was suggested as a valuable indicator of the viability of CCD.…”
Section: Reactive Dividing Wall Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptual design studies for the production of dialkyl ethers, including DME, indicated that, compared to conventional RD, CCD could achieve higher product purities while reducing the number of stages and the vapor flow rate. , Rasmussen et al analyzed the production of DME using quantitative metrics to evaluate the performance of CCD, including the mean Damköhler number, which accounts for characteristics of the technology.…”
Section: Case Studies To Demonstrate the Application Of The Synthesis...mentioning
confidence: 99%