2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative microbial risk assessment of occupational and public risks associated with bioaerosols generated during the application of dairy cattle wastewater as biofertilizer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it has been shown previously that a fraction of inhaled microorganisms is ingested as large particles (> 5 microns) are deposited in the upper respiratory tract and then swallowed. 17,18 Based on available quantitative microbial risk assessment models, 19 this fraction is considered to lie between 10%-80%. 19,20 Applying this range of ingested microorganisms to the mean airborne concentration of bacteria found in the same Swiss pig farms in a previous study (3.6 x 10 9 cfu/m 3 ), 21 we estimated that a worker with a normal breathing rate ingested between 6.9 × 10 5 cfu and 5.5 × 10 6 cfu during 4 hours of work in a pig barn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it has been shown previously that a fraction of inhaled microorganisms is ingested as large particles (> 5 microns) are deposited in the upper respiratory tract and then swallowed. 17,18 Based on available quantitative microbial risk assessment models, 19 this fraction is considered to lie between 10%-80%. 19,20 Applying this range of ingested microorganisms to the mean airborne concentration of bacteria found in the same Swiss pig farms in a previous study (3.6 x 10 9 cfu/m 3 ), 21 we estimated that a worker with a normal breathing rate ingested between 6.9 × 10 5 cfu and 5.5 × 10 6 cfu during 4 hours of work in a pig barn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the higher Pinf and Pinf.A for NoV compared to those for RoV are attributed to higher dose harmonization for NoV [ 23 ]. Until now, some few studies have mainly focused on QMRA of bioaerosols in air, mostly on estimated probability of infection and illness due to exposure to pathogenic viruses in air of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) [ 16 , 17 , 19 , 23 , 31 ]. For instance, Cheng Yan et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exposure to RoV and NoV through fecal-oral route are the most common cause of childhood gastroenteritis [ 8 , 15 ]. However, the pathogenic viruses can be spread out from water resources following mechanical activities and wind erosion in bioaerosol form [ 16 , 17 ]. The airborne particles containing both living and non-living components such as bacteria and viruses can be easily transferred and inhaled by the human which activate surroundings [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations