Proceedings of the 10th International Congress for Applied Mineralogy (ICAM) 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-27682-8_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Mineral Characterization of Granitic Pegmatite Using Topas Rietveld XRD Refinement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qualitatively, it has been previously noted that high-intensity peaks indicate higher IMC quantity [2]. Table 10 shows the results of quantifying the IMC volume fractions in the weld nugget considering the Topas Rietveld refinement method [27] on the XRD patterns of test nos. 2 and 3.…”
Section: Intermetallic Phases At the Weld Nugget Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitatively, it has been previously noted that high-intensity peaks indicate higher IMC quantity [2]. Table 10 shows the results of quantifying the IMC volume fractions in the weld nugget considering the Topas Rietveld refinement method [27] on the XRD patterns of test nos. 2 and 3.…”
Section: Intermetallic Phases At the Weld Nugget Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main minerals in this pegmatite are quartz, Na-rich feldspar and K-rich feldspar, while the minor minerals are mica and garnet. The method only quantifies the main minerals at this stage; though further mineral phases are included in Hestnes and Sørensen (2011). In this project the developed quantitative Rietveld XRD method has been compared to semi-quantitative XRD, semi-quantitative X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and diffraction (XRD) in combination, and an element to mineral conversion using chemical results from XRF and Electron Probe Micro-Analyzer (EPMA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%