2013
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.m113.029827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Molecular Phenotyping of Gill Remodeling in a Cichlid Fish Responding to Salinity Stress

Abstract: A two-tiered label-free quantitative (LFQ) proteomics workflow was used to elucidate how salinity affects the molecular phenotype, i.e. proteome, of gills from a cichlid fish, the euryhaline tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). The workflow consists of initial global profiling of relative tryptic peptide abundances in treated versus control samples followed by targeted identification (by MS/MS) and quantitation (by chromatographic peak area integration) of validated peptides for each protein of interest. Fresh w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peptides were injected in 2 µl volume corresponding to 330 ng total peptide amount using a nanoAcquity sample manager (Waters) and separated after 3 min sample trapping (Symmetry, Waters 186003514) on a 1.7 µm particle size BEH C18 column (250 mm×75 µm, Waters 186003545) by reversed phase chromatography using a nanoAcquity binary solvent manager (Waters). A 130 min linear solvent gradient ranging from 3% to 35% acetonitrile (ACN) was employed, internal calibration performed, and mass spectra acquired as previously described [37] except that an ImpactHD mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) was used. Raw data were converted into mzXML format using DataAnalysis 4.2 (Bruker Daltonics) and PEAKS suite 7 (BSI, Inc.), Mascot 2.2.7 (Matrixscience, Ltd.), and X!Tandem Cyclone (The GPM) were used for protein identification using the following parameters: enzyme specificity  =  trypsin, max.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptides were injected in 2 µl volume corresponding to 330 ng total peptide amount using a nanoAcquity sample manager (Waters) and separated after 3 min sample trapping (Symmetry, Waters 186003514) on a 1.7 µm particle size BEH C18 column (250 mm×75 µm, Waters 186003545) by reversed phase chromatography using a nanoAcquity binary solvent manager (Waters). A 130 min linear solvent gradient ranging from 3% to 35% acetonitrile (ACN) was employed, internal calibration performed, and mass spectra acquired as previously described [37] except that an ImpactHD mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) was used. Raw data were converted into mzXML format using DataAnalysis 4.2 (Bruker Daltonics) and PEAKS suite 7 (BSI, Inc.), Mascot 2.2.7 (Matrixscience, Ltd.), and X!Tandem Cyclone (The GPM) were used for protein identification using the following parameters: enzyme specificity  =  trypsin, max.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissue homogenization, protein extraction and in-solution digestion procedures were extensively optimized to yield quantitatively reproducible LC-MS/MS data and minimize protein modification during processing (Kültz et al, 2013). Each sample was homogenized under liquid nitrogen in a mortar and pestle.…”
Section: Protein Extraction and In Solution Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tryptic peptides were separated by nano‐ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) (Waters) using a 5–35% acetonitrile gradient over a 2‐hr retention time period and injected online into an Impact‐HD UHR‐qTOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). Following electrospray ionization, peptides were identified using data‐independent acquisition and tandem mass spectrometry as previously described (Kültz, Li, Gardell, & Sacchi, ). Label‐free quantification was performed using peaksq 8.0 for an MS1 Top3 approach and scaffold 4.8 for a spectral counting approach as previously described (Kültz et al., , ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following electrospray ionization, peptides were identified using data‐independent acquisition and tandem mass spectrometry as previously described (Kültz, Li, Gardell, & Sacchi, ). Label‐free quantification was performed using peaksq 8.0 for an MS1 Top3 approach and scaffold 4.8 for a spectral counting approach as previously described (Kültz et al., , ). More details on methodology and parameters used for quantitative proteomics are provided in Supporting Information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%