2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-020-01034-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative monitoring of changes in forest habitat connectivity following the great eastern Japan earthquake and tsunami

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By selecting a range of dispersal distances (from 100 m to 20,000 m), we showed that connectivity indices varied according to species' dispersal abilities [21,59,85]. The distances we calculated empirically, based on the behavior of graph-based connectivity indices for our landscape, were similar to the published dispersal distances of animals which are found in the study area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…By selecting a range of dispersal distances (from 100 m to 20,000 m), we showed that connectivity indices varied according to species' dispersal abilities [21,59,85]. The distances we calculated empirically, based on the behavior of graph-based connectivity indices for our landscape, were similar to the published dispersal distances of animals which are found in the study area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Graphab has also been frequently implemented in studies to support decisions directed at biodiversity preservation, allowing users to answer questions beginning with ''where''. In the field of environmental impact assessment: Where might species be the most impacted by landscape changes [9], climate changes [29][30][31], or natural disasters [32]? Where will the potential ecological impacts caused by the development of transport infrastructures [33][34][35] or of a large urban infrastructure [36] occur?…”
Section: Impact Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perturbations impact species persistence via the degradation of habitat, direct exploitation or persecution, or changes to ecological processes (Bragina et al, 2015;Hilton et al, 2003, Hirayama et al, 2020Reynolds et al, 2017;Steutermann Rogers, 2018;Zhang et al, 2009). In areas of conflict, the introduction of military infrastructure, defoliation, the exploitation and trade of wildlife by displaced people, or military or insurgent armies for food or to finance war efforts can have devastating effects upon species abundance (Brito et al, 2018;Butsic et al, 2015;Draulans & Van Krunkelsven, 2002;Dutta, 2020).…”
Section: Species Persistencementioning
confidence: 99%