2022
DOI: 10.22541/au.164301444.48213904/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative monitoring of diverse fish communities on a large scale combining eDNA metabarcoding and qPCR

Abstract: eDNA metabarcoding is an effective method for studying fish communities but allows only an estimation of relative species abundance (density / biomass). Here, we combine metabarcoding with an estimation of the total abundance of eDNA amplified by our universal marker (teleo) using a qPCR approach to infer the absolute abundance of fish species. We carried out a 2850 km eDNA survey within the Danube catchment using a spatial integrative sampling protocol coupled with traditional electrofishing for fish biomass … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 in Pont et al (2021); and in Suppl. Figure 1 in Pont et al (2022). This value was comparable to the total number of 71 species captured in the TEF survey conducted during the same period (Bammer et al 2021).…”
Section: Edna Extraction Pcr Amplification and Analysissupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 in Pont et al (2021); and in Suppl. Figure 1 in Pont et al (2022). This value was comparable to the total number of 71 species captured in the TEF survey conducted during the same period (Bammer et al 2021).…”
Section: Edna Extraction Pcr Amplification and Analysissupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Sequences shorter than 20 bp, or with fewer than 10 (or labeled "internal" by the OBICLEAN program) occurrences were excluded. The taxonomic assignment of molecular operational taxonomical units was performed using the ECOTAG program, based on a local "Sturgeon" reference database (see later), the "Danubian" database, obtained from (Pont et al 2022), the database obtained from Valentini et al (2016), and the sequences extracted from the release 142 (standard sequences) of the ENA database (http:// www. ebi.…”
Section: Edna Extraction Pcr Amplification and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the proportion of preferred habitat scales disproportionately with the square of bay area, and given that the eDNA is thoroughly mixed within the bay, this results in a dilution effect. Similar patterns of DNA dilution have been observed in rivers with elevated water discharges (Pont et al 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Specifically, the assay showed an amplification efficiency of 95.7%, which falls within the acceptable criteria range (90%-110%) of qPCR validation guideline set by Broeders et al (2014), and indicates that a high fraction of target DNAs are copied in each cycle. The curve-fitted model determined limit of detection (LOD) of this assay to be at 3.71 copies per reaction, which is at similar levels to other established eDNA assays on fish species, ranging between 2.19 to 22.1 copies per reaction (Kirtane et al, 2021;Klymus et al, 2020;Pont et al, 2023). On the other hand, the determined LOQ was 30 copies per reaction, which is an order of magnitude lower than some of the established fish eDNA assays at a range of 10 to 1000 copies per reaction (Kirtane et al, 2021), demonstrating the ability of the developed assay to detect target eDNA even at low concentration levels.…”
Section: E Akaara Species-specific Edna Assay Developmentsupporting
confidence: 60%