2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative MRI measurements of human fetal brain development in utero

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
51
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Retrospective analysis of fetal MR imaging posterior fossa measurements in cases that were proved to be normal were statistically close to control group by using 2-tailed t test; the measurements matched also those of normal fetuses at corresponding GAs in fetal biometry. [26][27][28] By comparing the mean and ratios of posterior fossa measurements in the different groups, those of the JSRD-affected group were higher than those in JSRD-nonaffected fetuses and the control group. The mean AP diameter of the cisterna magna measured 9.3 mm (SD 1.5) compared with 7 mm (SD 2.2) in nonaffected cases and 6 mm (SD 1.1) in the control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Retrospective analysis of fetal MR imaging posterior fossa measurements in cases that were proved to be normal were statistically close to control group by using 2-tailed t test; the measurements matched also those of normal fetuses at corresponding GAs in fetal biometry. [26][27][28] By comparing the mean and ratios of posterior fossa measurements in the different groups, those of the JSRD-affected group were higher than those in JSRD-nonaffected fetuses and the control group. The mean AP diameter of the cisterna magna measured 9.3 mm (SD 1.5) compared with 7 mm (SD 2.2) in nonaffected cases and 6 mm (SD 1.1) in the control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We correlated the measurements with those of normal fetuses at the same GA available in fetal biometry. [26][27][28] We compared MR imaging measurements obtained in fetuses at risk for JSRD with those of 24 age-matched fetuses (average, 22.2 weeks; SD 3.3; range, 18 -30; median, 21.5) with normal in utero brain MR imaging studies that were confirmed by normal detailed postnatal clinical and neurologic examination at an average age of 15.5 months (SD 5.3) and normal postnatal MR imaging done at an average age of 4.1 months (SD 2.3). Cases for the control group were selected from a large pool of participants in our study of MR imaging for at-risk pregnancies for brain anomalies.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another numerical experiment was performed by adding independent Gaussian noise with increasing STD to the synthesized motion corrupted neonatal dataset to create data sets with SNR 11, 8.3 and 6.7 corresponding to SNR values for slice thicknesses of 3.3mm, 2.5mm and 2mm respectively at typical 1.5T performance. These data were then reconstructed by SVR and compared to the original data [7]. Finally mot ion corrupted fetal, neonatal and adult data sets were each recons tructed by SVR using a final lattice control po int spacing of 0.5L (L = slice spacing in the scanner frame).…”
Section: Snr Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technical difficulties in assessing the brain size and structures increase as the pregnancy progresses with time due to skull ossification (18). Unlike US, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables precise analysis of embryonic brain biometry, and there are different normograms for both skull and cerebral MRI measurements (18,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%