BackgroundQuantitative parametric mapping is an increasingly important tool for noninvasive assessment of chronic liver disease. Conventional parametric mapping techniques require multiple breath‐held acquisitions and provide limited anatomic coverage.PurposeTo investigate a multi‐inversion spin and gradient echo (MI‐SAGE) technique for simultaneous estimation of T1, T2, and T2* of the liver.Study TypeProspective.SubjectsSixteen research participants, both adult and pediatric (age 17.5 ± 4.6 years, eight male), with and without known liver disease (seven asymptomatic healthy controls, two fibrotic liver disease, five steatotic liver disease, and two fibrotic and steatotic liver disease).Field Strength/Sequence1.5 T, single breath‐hold and respiratory triggered MI‐SAGE, breath‐hold modified Look–Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI, T1 mapping), breath‐hold gradient and spin echo (GRASE, T2 mapping), and multiple gradient echo (mGRE, T2* mapping) sequences.AssessmentAgreement between hepatic T1, T2, and T2* estimated using MI‐SAGE and conventional parametric mapping sequences was evaluated. Repeatability and reproducibility of MI‐SAGE were evaluated using a same‐session acquisition and second‐session acquisition.Statistical TestsBland–Altman analysis with bias assessment and limits of agreement (LOA) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).ResultsHepatic T1, T2, and T2* estimates obtained using the MI‐SAGE technique had mean biases of 72 (LOA: −22 to 166) msec, −3 (LOA: −10 to 5) msec, and 2 (LOA: −5 to 8) msec (single breath‐hold) and 36 (LOA: −43 to 120) msec, −3 (LOA: −17 to 11) msec, and 4 (LOA: −3 to 11) msec (respiratory triggered), respectively, in comparison to conventional acquisitions using MOLLI, GRASE, and mGRE. All MI‐SAGE estimates had strong repeatability and reproducibility (ICC > 0.72).Data ConclusionHepatic T1, T2, and T2* estimates obtained using an MI‐SAGE technique were comparable to conventional methods, although there was a 12%/6% for breath‐hold/respiratory triggered underestimation of T1 values compared to MOLLI. Both respiratory triggered and breath‐hold MI‐SAGE parameter maps demonstrated strong repeatability and reproducibility.Level of Evidence1Technical EfficacyStage 2