2015
DOI: 10.5480/13-1255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Outcomes for Nursing Students in a Flipped Classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
67
3
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
6
67
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some scholars have found more mixed results. Harrington et al (2015) found no significant differences in the learning outcomes for nursing students randomly assigned to either a flipped or traditional teaching style; Jensen et al (2015a) found similar results for introductory biology students between a flipped and non-flipped classroom. A systematic review of 21 nursing studies Betihavas et al (2016) similarly found overall themes of neutral or positive academic outcomes and mixed results for satisfaction.…”
Section: The Evidence On Flipped Classroomsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, some scholars have found more mixed results. Harrington et al (2015) found no significant differences in the learning outcomes for nursing students randomly assigned to either a flipped or traditional teaching style; Jensen et al (2015a) found similar results for introductory biology students between a flipped and non-flipped classroom. A systematic review of 21 nursing studies Betihavas et al (2016) similarly found overall themes of neutral or positive academic outcomes and mixed results for satisfaction.…”
Section: The Evidence On Flipped Classroomsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The proxy measure that taps the improvement of students’ academic performance has been their grade from a college course, such as the mid‐term and final grade (Geist, Larimore, Rawiszer, & Al Sager, ; Harrington, Bosch, Schoofs, Beel‐Bates, & Anderson, ; Huang & Fang, ; Lee, ). Some reported no statistical difference in the grades between the control and experimental groups (Geist et al .…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While other studies did not demonstrate a difference between traditional method and the FL model such as Harrington, Bosch, Schoofs, Beel-Bates, and Anderson (2015), who examined the impact of the FL model on nursing student at The Public University in the USA were the results did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the two methods in terms of outcomes. As well as Larson and Yamamoto (2013) conducted a study in Excel class on students' academic achievements were the results indicated that there is no statistically significant difference in mean scores between the two groups.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 67%