Quantitative parametrische Analyse der Kontrastkinetik von Läsionen in der dynamischen MR-Mammographie

Hauth, E. A.; Jaeger, Horst J.; Maderwald, Stefan; Mühler, Andreas; Forsting, Michael

doi:10.1007/s00117-007-1562-0

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the other 5 studies [20–22, 25, 29] patients with a suspect lesion on MRI were included. One of these 5 studies retrospectively searched the database of an ongoing MRI screening study of patients at high risk of breast cancer for BIRADS 3–5 lesions that were detected with MRI [22], and 2 studies included lesions that were not palpable and were not visible on mammography or ultrasound [20, 21].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In all 10 studies histology was used as the gold standard. In 4 studies a follow-up MRI after 6 or 24 months was performed [23, 25, 28, 29]; in the case of positive findings biopsy provided further histological assessment.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…of malignantNo. of benignType of analysisMRICAD systemArazi-Kleinman [22] 200953R, c1347 (26–68)562234TB1.5TCAD-GaeaMeeuwis [27] 200965R, c1449 (29–71)714922TB3.0TCADstreamBaltzer [23] 200951R, c1251 (13)904644TB1.5TDynaCADBaltzer [24] 2009329P, c1353 (15–83)469279190TB1.5TDynaCADVeltman [29] 2009NRR,c11NR522527TB1.5T3-Time-PointRenz [28] 200848P, c1151 (31)884345TB1.5TDynaCAD Full-time PointHauth [25] 2008137R10NR18361122TB1.5T3-Time-PointWilliams [21] 2006126R, c1452 (27–86)15441113TB1.5TCADstreamLehman [20] 200529R, c14NR33924TB1.5TCADstreamKelcz [26] 200257P, c1452 (31–80)683137TB1.5T3-Time-Point…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… a In studies in which more than one radiologist/resident (blinded) assessed the images, the pooled calculation was based on all relevant radiologists in that study b Meeuwis [27], Baltzer [24], Renz [28], Veltman [29] c Arazi-Kleinmann [22] Meeuwis [27], Baltzer [23], Baltzer [24], Renz [28], Veltman [29], Hauth [25], Kelcz [26] d Meeuwis [27], Renz [28], Veltman [29]…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1). Eight studies were in the English language [20–24, 26, 27, 29]; the other 2 were in the German Language [25, 28].

Fig.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Computer-aided detection in breast MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo evaluate the additional value of computer-aided detection (CAD) in breast MRI by assessing radiologists’ accuracy in discriminating benign from malignant breast lesions.MethodsA literature search was performed with inclusion of relevant studies using a commercially available CAD system with automatic colour mapping. Two independent researchers assessed the quality of the studies. The accuracy of the radiologists’ performance with and without CAD was presented as pooled sensitivity and specificity.ResultsOf 587 articles, 10 met the inclusion criteria, all of good methodological quality. Experienced radiologists reached comparable pooled sensitivity and specificity before and after using CAD (sensitivity: without CAD: 89%; 95% CI: 78–94%, with CAD: 89%; 95%CI: 81–94%) (specificity: without CAD: 86%; 95% CI: 79–91%, with CAD: 82%; 95% CI: 76–87%). For residents the pooled sensitivity increased from 72% (95% CI: 62–81%) without CAD to 89% (95% CI: 80–94%) with CAD, however, not significantly. Concerning specificity, the results were similar (without CAD: 79%; 95% CI: 69–86%, with CAD: 78%; 95% CI: 69–84%).ConclusionsCAD in breast MRI has little influence on the sensitivity and specificity of experienced radiologists and therefore their interpretation remains essential. However, residents or inexperienced radiologists seem to benefit from CAD concerning breast MRI evaluation.

show abstract