2013
DOI: 10.1111/jmi.12031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative particle microscopy in self‐metered fluids

Abstract: SummaryWe describe a simple device that volumetrically samples poured liquids and draws buoyant materials into a single field of view for quantitative particle microscopy. Our approach relies on the formation of axisymmetric menisci and computational models of the static fluid developed using SURFACE EVOLVER showed close agreement with experiment. The apparatus was evaluated by counting pollen and demonstrated utility for the field analysis of microparticles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These systems are undesirable for particle microscopy because particle beaching does not occur and the system is prone to shear indicating decreasing stability. This propensity to shear underpins an unmetered fluid loading approach (White et al ., ) and shows that at these volumes the governing dynamics of the droplet are dominated by gravity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These systems are undesirable for particle microscopy because particle beaching does not occur and the system is prone to shear indicating decreasing stability. This propensity to shear underpins an unmetered fluid loading approach (White et al ., ) and shows that at these volumes the governing dynamics of the droplet are dominated by gravity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…I–L) and presumably separated by a point of inflection, which shifts towards the well edge with the incremental reduction in volume. These observations are consistent with the previously observed system based on a hemispherical topology (White et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations