1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19991008)83:2<157::aid-ijc2>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative PCR analysis of c-erb B-2 (HER2/neu) gene amplification and comparison with p185HER2/neu protein expression in breast cancer drill biopsies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(17 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity was 91% and the specificity was 96%. Similar results correlating PCR and IH were obtained by P. Decremoux (23) and O'Malley (22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The sensitivity was 91% and the specificity was 96%. Similar results correlating PCR and IH were obtained by P. Decremoux (23) and O'Malley (22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In earlier studies, the status of ERBB2 was evaluated by Southern, Northern, or Western blot, and, more recently, by polymerase chain reaction. Results of these methods may be affected by the dilution of tumor material by normal cells (2,21). These drawbacks have prompted the development of in situ techniques, FISH and IHC, which enable the recognition of the marker of interest in tumor cells only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of positivity found in the various studies seems to be rather large: 5 to 55% for the amplification, and 10 to 55% for the overexpression (6). Indeed, results of molecular methods may be affected by the dilution of tumor material by normal cells and by the determination of the threshold defining the existence of an amplification or an overexpression (2,7,21). Recent technical developments have made possible the detection of the ERBB2 gene in tissue sections, touch preparations, and fine-needle aspirates using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (16,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Gene amplification, as analyzed by quantitative PCR, often correlates with protein expression determined by semiquantitative immunohistochemistry (26), but relationships with gene transcription have not been established, because of the lack of an accurate method for quantitating transcripts. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR, which has recently become available, can be used to determine relative amounts of mRNAs in cells and tissues, with a high sensitivity and accuracy (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%