2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative performance of forward fill/flush differential flow modulation for comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The oven temperature program was 50°C (3 min) to 325°C at 2.5°C/min. The modulation period was set to 4.5 s while modulation injection time was set to 0.19 s. Modulation parameters were optimized according to our previous work [28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oven temperature program was 50°C (3 min) to 325°C at 2.5°C/min. The modulation period was set to 4.5 s while modulation injection time was set to 0.19 s. Modulation parameters were optimized according to our previous work [28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in our previous work regarding forward fill/flush flow modulation [36], efficient modulation process occurs when fill and flush distances of the modulation channel are at their optimal value. We have previously demonstrated that the sum of modulator fill and flush distance should be equal to the length of the modulator channel ± 2 cm (15 ± 2 cm), and that the ratio of flush and fill distances should not be less than 2.5.…”
Section: Gc×gc-vuv/fid Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The oven temperature program was 50 (3 min)–325 °C at 2.5 °C min –1 . The modulation period was set to 4.5 s, and the modulation injection time was 0.18 s. The modulation injection time was optimized according to ref . A VGA-101 (VUV Analytics, Inc., Austin, TX, United States) detector was employed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%