2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07349-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative physical performance tests can effectively detect Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Purpose This review aimed to identify effective physical performance tests (PPT) as clinical outcome indicators for detecting and monitoring degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed on seven electronic databases on the effectiveness in detection and monitoring of DCM by PPT. All included studies were reviewed and undergone quality assessments on the risk-of-bias by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and were poole… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of case–control and cohort studies was measured for multiple aspects, including selection, comparability, exposure, and outcome 21 . A total rate equal or less than four highlights a low‐quality score; a range from four to six expresses an intermediate quality score; a score from seven to nine represents an high‐quality score 22 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quality of case–control and cohort studies was measured for multiple aspects, including selection, comparability, exposure, and outcome 21 . A total rate equal or less than four highlights a low‐quality score; a range from four to six expresses an intermediate quality score; a score from seven to nine represents an high‐quality score 22 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 A total rate equal or less than four highlights a low-quality score; a range from four to six expresses an intermediate quality score; a score from seven to nine represents an high-quality score. 22…”
Section: Quality Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several tools are available for assessing hand function, counting G&R cycles within 10 seconds remains a straightforward and accessible method that does not require specialized equipment. 8 According to our findings, hand dexterity in DCM patients is classified as follows: normal hand function ( ≥ 20 cycles), mild impairment (17 to 19 cycles), moderate impairment (14 to 16 cycles), and severe impairment (0 to 13 cycles). Patients with mild impairment may not be cognizant of their diminished hand dexterity, whereas those with severe impairment experience significant disruptions in their daily lives and are strongly recommended for surgical intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Various physical performance tests for DCM have been developed, including the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension Version Myelopathy (GRASSP-M) and the 10-second grip and release (10s-G&R) test. [6][7][8] The GRASSP-M assesses strength, sensibility, and prehension, while the 10s-G&R test focuses on evaluating hand dexterity through the capture of grip and release motion. However, the GRASSP-M test requires trained experts and specialized tools for its complicated evaluation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Clumsy finger movement, also termed myelopathy hand, [5][6][7][8] often occurs as a symptom of DCM. 3,[9][10][11][12] The clinical significance of myelopathy hand 13,14 is that it can be used as an indicator of neurological status and indicate the severity of myelopathy. 15,16 Impaired flexion and extension of the ulnar two or three fingers and inability to grip and release (G&R) the hands rapidly are frequently encountered in DCM patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%