2017
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_278_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative physiological measurements to evaluate the response of antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment in patients with neovascular diseases

Abstract: Antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment is still used intravitreally worldwide for various neovascular diseases, despite other available, approved treatments. We performed a systematic search of the literature focused on visual physiology studies. We used the online biomedical search engine PubMed and searched key words including “M-chart,” “Preferential Hyperacuity Perimetry,” “microperimetry,” (MP) “electroretinography,” and “contrast sensitivity” to estimate treatment efficacy of anti-VEGF t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 88 publications
(149 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 28 , 29 ] Other visual function tests, for example, the Amsler chart, M-chart, preferential hyperacuity perimetry, contrast sensitivity, and electroretinography add detailed information of the visual function in macular diseases. [ 30 ] These examinations provide different aspects of visual function, and MP has the advantage of assessing additional information in the central area of 10° around the fovea quantitatively. [ 29 , 31 , 32 ] In addition, follow-up examinations have been useful to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 28 , 29 ] Other visual function tests, for example, the Amsler chart, M-chart, preferential hyperacuity perimetry, contrast sensitivity, and electroretinography add detailed information of the visual function in macular diseases. [ 30 ] These examinations provide different aspects of visual function, and MP has the advantage of assessing additional information in the central area of 10° around the fovea quantitatively. [ 29 , 31 , 32 ] In addition, follow-up examinations have been useful to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%