2018
DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative prevalence and characterization of Campylobacter from chicken and duck carcasses from poultry slaughterhouses in South Korea

Abstract: The objective of this study was to assess the quantitative prevalence, antibiotic resistance, and molecular subtyping pattern of Campylobacter isolates from chicken and duck products from poultry slaughterhouses in South Korea. A total of 240 chicken (n = 120) and duck (n = 120) carcass samples collected from 12 poultry slaughterhouses between June 2014 and February 2015 in 12 South Korean cities was tested, and 131 samples were positive for Campylobacter. Duck samples showed a higher prevalence (P < 0.05; 93 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, a high rate of Campylobacter was detected in 240 (28.40%) isolates from meat carcasses, and this gives valuable insight into the possible risks of foodborne infection to humans. Studies carried out in Italy by Stella et al [55], in Malaysia [56], in China [57], in France [58], and in South Korea [59] also detected Campylobacter in meat samples with detection rates of 34.10%, 50.9%, 48.9%, 76%, and 31.67%, respectively, and our findings are in line with their reports. Other studies carried out in Spain by García-Sánchez et al [60], in Pakistan by Nisar et al [3], in Yangzhou, China by Zou et al [61], and in Northern Poland by Andrzejewska et al [62] also detected Campylobacter in meat samples, and these results are also akin with their reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this study, a high rate of Campylobacter was detected in 240 (28.40%) isolates from meat carcasses, and this gives valuable insight into the possible risks of foodborne infection to humans. Studies carried out in Italy by Stella et al [55], in Malaysia [56], in China [57], in France [58], and in South Korea [59] also detected Campylobacter in meat samples with detection rates of 34.10%, 50.9%, 48.9%, 76%, and 31.67%, respectively, and our findings are in line with their reports. Other studies carried out in Spain by García-Sánchez et al [60], in Pakistan by Nisar et al [3], in Yangzhou, China by Zou et al [61], and in Northern Poland by Andrzejewska et al [62] also detected Campylobacter in meat samples, and these results are also akin with their reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…According to statistics provided by the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency of Korea 7 (accessed on May 2019) over the last 2 years, the antibiotic-resistance rates of poultry-derived C. jejuni against ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, and tetracycline were 97.4, 94.7, and 63.2%, respectively. In addition, almost all C. jejuni isolates from humans and livestock in Korea were resistant to at least one antibiotic (Kim et al, 2016;Chon et al, 2018). However, in this study, the antibiotic-resistance patterns of C. jejuni from wild mice deviated from this pattern.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…mCCD agar showed greater efficacy to enumerate Campylobacter than to isolate the bacterium after 24-h enrichment in Bolton broth ( P < 0.0001) in concurrently analyzed samples. Similar to our findings, Chon et al. (2018) detected higher Campylobacter prevalence rates in poultry meat samples by an enumerative assay than by a qualitative analysis with a selective enrichment step.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%