2019
DOI: 10.1007/s41348-019-00258-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of Pseudomonas amygdali pv. lachrymans in cucumber leaf rinse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Psl was identified in samples by qPCR according to Gazdik et al [27] and based on a sequence of the nfrB gene. A 2 µL of sample was added to reaction mixture consisting of 5 µL 2×SensiFast Sybr No-Rox Mix, 1 µL of each primer (10 µM): Pal-nfrB-fwd (5 -GTA CGG TAT GCA AGC GAT CTTC-3 ) and Pal-nfrB-rev (5 -CCG AAA CAG GTA ACG GT-3 ) [27], and 1 µL of water. Quantification of bacteria was based on a standard curve made of three-fold dilutions of genomic DNA of the reference strain Psl 1729 and is presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Bacterial Samples Verification and Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Psl was identified in samples by qPCR according to Gazdik et al [27] and based on a sequence of the nfrB gene. A 2 µL of sample was added to reaction mixture consisting of 5 µL 2×SensiFast Sybr No-Rox Mix, 1 µL of each primer (10 µM): Pal-nfrB-fwd (5 -GTA CGG TAT GCA AGC GAT CTTC-3 ) and Pal-nfrB-rev (5 -CCG AAA CAG GTA ACG GT-3 ) [27], and 1 µL of water. Quantification of bacteria was based on a standard curve made of three-fold dilutions of genomic DNA of the reference strain Psl 1729 and is presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Bacterial Samples Verification and Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 presents in detail the comparison of various detection methods of Pseudomonas syringae species mentioned in this article with the proposed electrochemical biosensor. According to the standard PCR method, which detects bacterial cells, this assay is less sensitive than real-time qPCR [27]. The real-time qPCR LOD is 1.3 times lower, but these values are very similar, in the same order of magnitude.…”
Section: Psl Bacteria Detection On Developed Electrochemical Immunosementioning
confidence: 99%