2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay for research studies on enterovirus infections in the central nervous system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of performing our assay in separate reactions is to achieve specific and simultaneous detection, without the risk of cross-contamination. Using this method, 100% sensitivity was obtained for the 3 viruses, and we observed no cross-reactions with any of the viruses analyzed; additionally, specificities with high values were achieved (EV: 96%, HSV1: 100%, and HSV2: 94%), similar to those reported with the end-point and other real-time techniques, and even higher than the specificity achieved with other commercial kits [7,11,[16][17][18][19][20][21] . These results indicate that the sequences used for the primers and probes are specific; in the case of EV, the primers allow the identification of all viruses grouped in the genus, as the target sequence is highly conserved among its members; in the case of HSV1 and HSV2, as the primers are aimed at 2 different targets, this protocol can achieve differential diagnosis between these 2 viruses, without observing the cross-reactions that have been reported in other studies that use different areas of the same target [22][23][24] .…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The purpose of performing our assay in separate reactions is to achieve specific and simultaneous detection, without the risk of cross-contamination. Using this method, 100% sensitivity was obtained for the 3 viruses, and we observed no cross-reactions with any of the viruses analyzed; additionally, specificities with high values were achieved (EV: 96%, HSV1: 100%, and HSV2: 94%), similar to those reported with the end-point and other real-time techniques, and even higher than the specificity achieved with other commercial kits [7,11,[16][17][18][19][20][21] . These results indicate that the sequences used for the primers and probes are specific; in the case of EV, the primers allow the identification of all viruses grouped in the genus, as the target sequence is highly conserved among its members; in the case of HSV1 and HSV2, as the primers are aimed at 2 different targets, this protocol can achieve differential diagnosis between these 2 viruses, without observing the cross-reactions that have been reported in other studies that use different areas of the same target [22][23][24] .…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…The reproducibility of the assay was demonstrated by the consistency of the 3 reactions in 5 replicates with plasmid-positive controls. Their Ct values and the CV indicated that the data behaved homogeneously in each dilution, with values being located within an acceptable range (0.33-2.37%) for diagnostic purposes [11,21] . Unlike many proposed real-time techniques for the detection of the viruses studied here, our test used an internal control for each sample in each round of amplification, which enabled verification of the integrity of the sample and the presence of contamination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nucleic acids were extracted from 200 ml supernatant or the whole cells and supernatant using a NucliSens EasyMAG extractor (bioMérieux) and were eluted with 25 ml elution buffer provided by the manufacturer. A previously described competitive internal control was added during the extraction step and amplified in our in-house qRT-PCR assay (Volle et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%