2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.2.094601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative relevance of substitutional impurities to carrier dynamics in diamond

Abstract: We have quantified substitutional impurity concentrations in synthetic diamond crystals down to sub parts-per-billion levels. The capture lifetimes of electrons and excitons injected by photoexcitation were compared for several samples with different impurity concentrations. Based on the assessed impurity concentrations, we have determined the capture cross section of electrons to boron impurity, σA = 1.3 × 10 −14 cm 2 , and that of excitons to nitrogen impurity, σ ex D = 3.1 × 10 −14 cm 2 . The general tenden… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies on moderate purity diamonds [4], the decay time was modeled in the range 75 − 300 K by considering nonradiative processes in the bulk lifetime, i.e., impurity trapping and exciton ionization. Contrary to this, we found that the impurity trapping occurred significantly slower than the radiative decay in the present samples, based on the upper limits of the impurity concentrations and capture cross sections [11]. The possibility of exciton two-body annihilation was also excluded, considering the low exciton density (< 10 16 cm −3 ).…”
Section: Sample Characterization -contrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies on moderate purity diamonds [4], the decay time was modeled in the range 75 − 300 K by considering nonradiative processes in the bulk lifetime, i.e., impurity trapping and exciton ionization. Contrary to this, we found that the impurity trapping occurred significantly slower than the radiative decay in the present samples, based on the upper limits of the impurity concentrations and capture cross sections [11]. The possibility of exciton two-body annihilation was also excluded, considering the low exciton density (< 10 16 cm −3 ).…”
Section: Sample Characterization -contrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Sample 2 is a commercially available electric-grade sample. The nitrogen impurity concentrations of sample 2 and 3, measured by electron paramagnetic resonance [11], were 0.07 ± 0.02 ppb and 0.05 ± 0.03 ppb, respectively. In all three samples the boron concentrations were lower than 0.2 ppb.…”
Section: Sample Characterization -mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The calculated spatial distribution of the NV − concentration is shown in Figure 4b, again at t = 0, 1, and 5 ns, obtained by solving eqs 1a−1c. Given that the electron excitation crosssections for NV 0 excitation and NV − → NV 0 conversion are unknown, we estimate them by considering the known exciton capture cross-section of a nitrogen impurity in diamond, 59 σ 0 eh = σ c eh = 3 × 10 −6 μm 2 . We consider v th = 100 μm/ns, τ back = 500 ms, as obtained from the experimental data in Figure 3b, and an initial homogeneous NV − fraction of 0.4 (black line in Figure 4b for t = 0 ns), corresponding to the experimental data in Figure 2e.…”
Section: ■ Pump−probe CL Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lifetime recorded from the 100 growth sector in HPHT diamond falls on the blue curve, which indicates that boron is by far the majority impurity in this growth sector. Interestingly Shimomura et al [20] have clearly shown that nitrogen was the majority impurity in a serie of diamond samples with comparable concentrations of residual impurities. This highlights a disparity in the conductivity type, p or n, among the high purity crystals graded as IIa diamonds.…”
Section: Trclmentioning
confidence: 98%