2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative risk analysis of oil storage facilities in seismic areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.1.3 for a variable l). Equation 3 is well suited to describe the typical S-shaped vulnerability curve used in damage assessment for earthquakes (Fabbrocino et al 2005), volcanic eruptions (Spence et al 2005;Zuccaro et al 2008), winds (Wehner et al 2010), fluvial floods (Reese and Ramsay 2010), tsunamis (Srivihok et al 2012) or asteroid impacts (Mignan et al 2011). In the present case, we consider a single-damage state, which is an oversimplification compared to standard risk assessment.…”
Section: Building a Stochastic Event Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.1.3 for a variable l). Equation 3 is well suited to describe the typical S-shaped vulnerability curve used in damage assessment for earthquakes (Fabbrocino et al 2005), volcanic eruptions (Spence et al 2005;Zuccaro et al 2008), winds (Wehner et al 2010), fluvial floods (Reese and Ramsay 2010), tsunamis (Srivihok et al 2012) or asteroid impacts (Mignan et al 2011). In the present case, we consider a single-damage state, which is an oversimplification compared to standard risk assessment.…”
Section: Building a Stochastic Event Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of critical importance for the community and the environment to prevent such incidents from happening. Fuel storage tanks in petrochemical plants need to be regarded as high risk structures, due to their fragility to earthquakes and their potential for cascading effects (Fabbrocino et al, 2005). Their low impulsive frequencies can fall within the excitation frequencies of earthquakes and significant effort is required to isolate them against seismic vibrations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this sample can be used for damage assessing within the scheme of Bayesian reasoning. A potential field of application of the proposed approach are risk studies of hazardous industrial facilities like the ones described by Fabbrocino et al (2005) and Na and Shinozuka (2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fabbrocino et al 2005, Lee, Rosowski 2006Li, Ellingwood 2007). Such a function does not contain subjectively assigned information in the form of epistemic uncertainty measures (is purely objective).…”
Section: Crisp and Uncertain Fragility Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%