2007
DOI: 10.1021/ja074070i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Single Molecule Measurements on the Interaction Forces of Poly(l-glutamic acid) with Calcite Crystals

Abstract: The interaction between poly(L-glutamic acid) (PLE) and calcite crystals was studied with AFM-based single molecule force spectroscopy. Block copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and PLE were synthesized and covalently attached to the tip of an AFM cantilever. In desorption measurements the molecules were allowed to adsorb on the calcite crystal faces and afterward successively desorbed. The corresponding desorption forces were detected with high precision, showing for example a force transition between th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the other inorganic skeletons (Yang et al 2006;Yu and Yoshimura 2000), e.g., calcium carbonate Sonnenberg et al 2007;Kulak et al 2007), barium sulfate was rarely selected in mineralization reactions (Nagaraja et al 2009;Yu et al 2003). However, it is more suitable for use in wastewater treatment owing to its water insoluble and acid-resistant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the other inorganic skeletons (Yang et al 2006;Yu and Yoshimura 2000), e.g., calcium carbonate Sonnenberg et al 2007;Kulak et al 2007), barium sulfate was rarely selected in mineralization reactions (Nagaraja et al 2009;Yu et al 2003). However, it is more suitable for use in wastewater treatment owing to its water insoluble and acid-resistant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it could be seen that the middle part of the force curve in water at 35 C was even lower than that in organic solvents, which could be explained by two factors. First, water was a poor solvent for PNIPAM at 35 C, and the amount of bound water around the PNIPAM chain was considerably reduced in this condition compared to the case at RT [85][86][87]. Thus, compared to the case in water at RT, the energy needed for the water rearrangement upon stretching PNIPAM chain was greatly reduced in water at 35 C. This factor may roughly correspond to the energy difference between water at RT and organic solvents.…”
Section: Pnipammentioning
confidence: 97%
“…That is, the entropies of the final state are the same (S % 0) in the two conditions. However, it is known that the conformation of PNIPAM in water at 35 C is much more compact than that in water at RT, i.e., the initial entropy of PNIPAM at 35 C is much less than that at RT. Thus, the energy cost of a compact conformation would be less than that of a coil conformation.…”
Section: Pnipammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations