2009
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.1359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative sphingosine measurement as a surrogate for total ceramide concentration—preclinical and potential translational applications

Abstract: Biomarkers are an increasingly important constituent of the drug development process, offering the potential of increased efficiency through reduced compound attrition and earlier proof of mechanism and/or efficacy. Assays developed for compound screening that can be directly translated for clinical trials are especially valuable, but their successful adoption requires a careful balance between assay performance and implementation costs. One such 'fit-for-purpose' biomarker assay, the indirect measurement of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…including thin-layer chromatography (TLC) [24], high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)[12], immunochemical methodologies [25], enzymatic assay [13], tandem mass spectrometry[22], liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) [11,1417,21,26], gas chromatography[18,19], and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [18,19,23]. While assays for Cer(22:0) and Cer(24:0)have previously been reported [14,16,26], these types of assays, however, are not well-suited for clinical application because matrix-based quality control (QC) samples are not used to monitor assay performance and robustness, and sample throughput tends to be low. Here, we describe a high-throughput method for determination of Cer(22:0) and Cer(24:0) that is validated according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) bioanalytical method validation guidance [27] and the principles of fit-for-purpose assay method development for biomarker measurement [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…including thin-layer chromatography (TLC) [24], high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)[12], immunochemical methodologies [25], enzymatic assay [13], tandem mass spectrometry[22], liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) [11,1417,21,26], gas chromatography[18,19], and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [18,19,23]. While assays for Cer(22:0) and Cer(24:0)have previously been reported [14,16,26], these types of assays, however, are not well-suited for clinical application because matrix-based quality control (QC) samples are not used to monitor assay performance and robustness, and sample throughput tends to be low. Here, we describe a high-throughput method for determination of Cer(22:0) and Cer(24:0) that is validated according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) bioanalytical method validation guidance [27] and the principles of fit-for-purpose assay method development for biomarker measurement [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%