1994
DOI: 10.1002/fam.810180204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative structure—property relationships for auto‐ignition temperatures of organic compounds

Abstract: Quantitative structureproperty relationship techniques were applied to develop a predictive method for autoignition temperatures of a wide range of organic molecules, ioeludmg hydrocarbons, alcohols, phenols, ethers, aldehydes, ketones, acids, amines, esters and halogenated compounds. Multivariate linear regression models in terms of easily available molecular descriptors or intrinsic molecular properties such as critical pressure, parachor, atomic charges, etc were p r o m . Principal component analysis on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen from Table 2, for the SVM model, the resulting average absolute error (AAE) values of both training and external prediction sets are within the experimental error of AIT determination, which is around ±30 • C [4,44]. Meanwhile, it is noteworthy that the root mean square error (RMSE) values are not only low but also as similar as possible for the training and test sets, which suggests that the proposed model has both predictive ability (low values) and generalization performance (similar values) [37].…”
Section: Results Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen from Table 2, for the SVM model, the resulting average absolute error (AAE) values of both training and external prediction sets are within the experimental error of AIT determination, which is around ±30 • C [4,44]. Meanwhile, it is noteworthy that the root mean square error (RMSE) values are not only low but also as similar as possible for the training and test sets, which suggests that the proposed model has both predictive ability (low values) and generalization performance (similar values) [37].…”
Section: Results Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Such as the works of Suzuki [4] and Tetteh et al [5], both of them used the same six parameters, which contained unconventional physicochemical parameters such as critical pressure and parachor, to predict the AIT of organic compounds by means of multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) technologies, respectively. Although these methods are able to predict AIT with moderate success, they also suffer from some important disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A QSPR study on autoignition temperatures of 250 organic molecules, including hydrocarbons, alcohols, phenols, ethers, aldehydes, ketones, acids, amines, esters, and halogenated compounds has been reported [25]. Multivariate linear regression models in terms of easily available molecular descriptors or intrinsic molecular properties such as critical pressure, parachor, atomic charges, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies have shown that the AIT of a compound is very dependent on its structure, and several methods for estimating pure components AIT from their molecular structure alone have been reported in the literature [1][2][3][4][5]. Mitchell and Jurs [3] developed mathematical models which related the structures of a heterogeneous group of organic compounds to their AIT values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%