1974
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(74)90063-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative studies of the inhibitory effect of perchlorate on the concentration of 36ClO4−125I− and 99mTcO4− in salivary glands of male and female mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…¡ is approximately a factor of 10 lower than that of iodide (Halmi and Stuelke, 1959;Harden et al, 1968;Chow et al, 1969;Lazarus et al, 1974).…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…¡ is approximately a factor of 10 lower than that of iodide (Halmi and Stuelke, 1959;Harden et al, 1968;Chow et al, 1969;Lazarus et al, 1974).…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In the model, a slightly lower value of 1.0£10 9 ng/l was used for K m TL i , based on the ability of the model to better fit the later (>8 h) time points. The binding of ClO 4 ¡ to NIS was assigned a value ranging from 1.0£10 5 to 1.8£10 5 ng/l, based on the work of Wolff and Maurey (1963) as well as several other studies, suggesting that the K m of ClO 4 ¡ is approximately a factor of 10 lower than that of iodide (Halmi and Stuelke, 1959;Harden et al, 1968;Chow et al, 1969;Lazarus et al, 1974).…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the K m value for binding of ClO 4 to NIS (KmTF p ) was set between these two values (1.0 ϫ 10 5 ng/l) in the model. This value is further supported by various literature sources suggesting that ClO 4 actually has as much as an order of magnitude greater affinity for NIS than Iitself (Chow et al, 1969;Halmi and Stuelke, 1959;Harden et al, 1968;Lazarus et al, 1974). The K m for the second transport mechanism in the thyroid colloid (KmTL p ) was set to 1.0 ϫ 10 8 ng/l, approximately a factor of 10 lower than the K m values used for iodide.…”
Section: Dosing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 63%