2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09338-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative susceptibility mapping of the normal-appearing white matter as a potential new marker of disability progression in multiple sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Abbreviations: Assoc = association, NAWM = normal-appearing white matter, NAGM = normal-appearing grey matter. Clinical and demographical variables in relation to QSM variables Studies with significant results Studies without significant results Proportion of significant findings (%) Reference Assoc Reference Expanded Disease Status Scale Lesion frequency Castellaro et al (2017) + Guo et al (2021) 2/5 (40 %) Tolaymat et al (2020) Haacke et al (2021) Pelizzari et al (2020) Lesion QSM values Coffman et al (2022) + Guo et al (2021) 1/3 (33 %) Harrison et al (2016) Rim lesion frequency Huang et al (2022) + Cronin et al (2016) 4/7 (57 %) Marcille et al (2022) Jang et al (2020) Coffman et al (2022) Yao et al (2018) Tolaymat et al (2020) NAWM QSM values Pietroboni et al (2022) + Pontillo et al (2023) 1/3 (33 %) Hamdy et al (2022) Neurological Assessments Lesion frequency Harrison et al (2016) 0/1 (0 %) Lesion QSM values Harrison et al (2016) 0/1 (0 %) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Abbreviations: Assoc = association, NAWM = normal-appearing white matter, NAGM = normal-appearing grey matter. Clinical and demographical variables in relation to QSM variables Studies with significant results Studies without significant results Proportion of significant findings (%) Reference Assoc Reference Expanded Disease Status Scale Lesion frequency Castellaro et al (2017) + Guo et al (2021) 2/5 (40 %) Tolaymat et al (2020) Haacke et al (2021) Pelizzari et al (2020) Lesion QSM values Coffman et al (2022) + Guo et al (2021) 1/3 (33 %) Harrison et al (2016) Rim lesion frequency Huang et al (2022) + Cronin et al (2016) 4/7 (57 %) Marcille et al (2022) Jang et al (2020) Coffman et al (2022) Yao et al (2018) Tolaymat et al (2020) NAWM QSM values Pietroboni et al (2022) + Pontillo et al (2023) 1/3 (33 %) Hamdy et al (2022) Neurological Assessments Lesion frequency Harrison et al (2016) 0/1 (0 %) Lesion QSM values Harrison et al (2016) 0/1 (0 %) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1/1 (100 %) Rim lesion frequency Harrison et al (2016) n.a. 1/1 (100 %) QSM lesion volume Pelizzari et al (2020) 0/2 (0 %) Tolaymat et al (2020) NAWM QSM values Pietroboni et al (2022) n.a. 1/1 (100 %) …”
Section: Resultsunclassified