2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2015.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative systematic analysis of vocal tract data

Abstract: different sounds and speakers in a common representation. Representative application examples, concerning the articulatory characterisation of European Portuguese vowels, are presented to illustrate the capabilities of the proposed framework, both for static configurations and the assessment of dynamic aspects during speech production.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this set of variables we move away from choosing fixed points over the tongue, as in previous work. Instead, maximal constrictions are determined between different tract segments (e.g., tongue tip and hard palate, identified based on the segmentation data [16]) as follows:…”
Section: Choice and Computation Of Tract Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this set of variables we move away from choosing fixed points over the tongue, as in previous work. Instead, maximal constrictions are determined between different tract segments (e.g., tongue tip and hard palate, identified based on the segmentation data [16]) as follows:…”
Section: Choice and Computation Of Tract Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vocal tract outlines were extracted adopting the method proposed by Silva et al [17], resulting in contours identifying the different regions of interest, as depicted in Figure 1.…”
Section: Vocal Tract Data Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison among vocal tract configurations was performed adopting and extending a previously proposed framework (for the sake of brevity, additional details can be found in [18,17,19]) enabling normalized quantification of differences, for different articulators/regions of the vocal tract and their visualization (in a diagram as illustrated in Fig. 1: velum (VEL), tongue dorsum (TD), tongue back (TB), tongue tip (TT), lip protrusion (LP), lip aperture (LA) and pharynx (Ph).…”
Section: Vocal Tract Data Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of MR sequences are now in use for vocal tract imaging, with each providing different extents of spatial and temporal resolution, as well as varying artifact sensitivity. Commonly used 2D acquisitions include Cartesian sequences (single-slice gradient echo, e.g., Silva & Teixeira, 2015a) spiral acquisitions (e.g., Bresch & Narayanan, 2009;Narayanan et al, 2004), and radial acquisitions (e.g., Niebergall et al, 2013). Approaches to imaging the vocal tract in 3D have typically employed multi-slice T1w acquisitions (e.g., Badin et al, 2002;Baer et al, 1991).…”
Section: Vocal Tract Mr -Sequences and Acquisition Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More elaborate computational approaches have been developed recently, imposing specific model predictions concerning vocal tract morphology and articulator position (e.g., Bresch & Narayanan, 2009;Silva & Teixeira, 2015a). In one such approach, the model is trained a priori on a corpus of real-time images; vocal tract data from a given subject may then be segmented based on the model's assumptions regarding vocal tract morphology (Silva & Teixeira, 2015b).…”
Section: Vocal Tract Mr -Automated Segmentation and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%