2015
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative trait loci affecting the 3D skull shape and size in mouse and prioritization of candidate genes in-silico

Abstract: Citation:Maga AM, Navarro N, Cunningham ML and Cox TC (2015) Quantitative trait loci affecting the 3D skull shape and size in mouse and prioritization of candidate genes in-silico. Front. Physiol. 6:92. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00092 Quantitative trait loci affecting the 3D skull shape and size in mouse and prioritization of candidate genes in-silico We describe the first application of high-resolution 3D micro-computed tomography, together with 3D landmarks and geometric morphometrics, to map QTL respons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In mice, whole-genome QTL studies have identified numerous genetic regions associated with craniofacial traits 3133 . In humans, both candidate gene 10,34,35 and GWAS 27 have implicated specific variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mice, whole-genome QTL studies have identified numerous genetic regions associated with craniofacial traits 3133 . In humans, both candidate gene 10,34,35 and GWAS 27 have implicated specific variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Maga et al . ), and skull shape is also known to show considerable plasticity during development (Gonzalez et al . ; Noback & Harvati ).…”
Section: From Phenotype To Genotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date, there are no studies addressing the genetic basis of natural craniofacial differences between the subspecies of the house mouse (but see Burgio et al (2009);Burgio et al (2012) for an approach using inbred lines of M. musculus and Mus spretus). In contrast, the genetic factors underlying differences between traditional inbred lines (i.e., LG/J, SM/J, A/J, and B6) have been extensively studied (Cheverud et al 1997;Leamy et al 1999;Klingenberg et al 2004;Wolf et al 2005;Burgio et al 2009;Maga et al 2015).…”
Section: Communicated By Nico Posnien and Nikola-michael Prpicmentioning
confidence: 99%