2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-019-03296-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative trait loci mapping in hybrids between Dent and Flint maize multiparental populations reveals group-specific QTL for silage quality traits with variable pleiotropic effects on yield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For ADF, once again, progeny 159.6 presented a favorable GCA value, whereas topcross 159.6 x AG8025 had one for SCA (Figure 5). Therefore, progeny 159.6 has the potential of reducing fibrous portions and of increasing digestibility percentage in future crossings, which is an important result due to the difficulty of obtaining genotypes that favor the reduction of the fiber contents (Pirondini et al, 2015;Seye et al, 2019), which evidences a higher concentration of genes that allow reducing NDF and ADF contents. With regard to DMD, progeny 199.2 presented positive GCA estimates, as well as of SCA in crossbreedings with the elite test lineages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For ADF, once again, progeny 159.6 presented a favorable GCA value, whereas topcross 159.6 x AG8025 had one for SCA (Figure 5). Therefore, progeny 159.6 has the potential of reducing fibrous portions and of increasing digestibility percentage in future crossings, which is an important result due to the difficulty of obtaining genotypes that favor the reduction of the fiber contents (Pirondini et al, 2015;Seye et al, 2019), which evidences a higher concentration of genes that allow reducing NDF and ADF contents. With regard to DMD, progeny 199.2 presented positive GCA estimates, as well as of SCA in crossbreedings with the elite test lineages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In corn breeding programs, there is still not a consensus on how to select the best tester to discriminate the genetic potential of progenies (Lobato-Ortiz et al, 2010). Many authors concluded that the choice of the best tester should be based on genetic merit, with a high frequency of favorable alleles, as well as on genetic factors related to additive and nonadditive actions (Lobato-Ortiz et al, 2010;Pirondini et al, 2015;Seye et al, 2019). However, Hallauer et al (2010) emphasized that the best tester is the one that simply classifies correctly the genetic merit of progenies based on estimates of genetic variance components, disregarding other information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantage to focusing on the Stiff Stalk group is that maize breeding relies on recycling genetics within heterotic groups to make new parents and crossing parents between groups to make hybrids. In a factorial mating design between Flint and Dent multiparent populations, it was discovered that the majority of general combining ability QTL were specific to one heterotic group (Giraud et al 2017; Seye et al 2019). Thus, blending the genomes of parents within a single heterotic group versus across the diversity of maize creates a more applicable population to study the subset of alleles present within Stiff Stalk seed parent germplasm released in North America.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is highly efficient and has been applied for high-throughput screening to predict the properties and compositions of large numbers of samples [ 14 ], especially for phenotyping and genomic selection in crop breeding [ 15 , 16 ]. It has been used for quality trait (such as juice soluble solids content, i.e., Brix, juice pH, firmness and water content) phenotyping in tomatoes [ 17 ]; estimation of sucrose, glucose, and fructose in sweet sorghum juice [ 18 ]; phenotyping of malt extract and protein content in barley [ 19 ]; assessment of amino acid concentrations for quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis in soybean [ 20 ]; quantitative monitoring of sucrose, reducing sugars and total sugar dynamics for phenotyping of water-deficit stress tolerance in rice [ 21 ]; prediction of silage quality traits for QTL mapping in maize [ 22 ]; and herbage quality trait analysis [ 23 ]. In addition, NIRS has also been used to determine chemical compounds in sugarcane, which is used for analysis of phosphorus in leaves [ 24 ], estimation of mineral content under saline conditions [ 25 ], and estimation of cell wall components in stalks [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%