Quantitative Ultrasound and Bone Health in Elderly People, a Systematic Review

Escobio-Prieto, Isabel; Blanco‐Díaz, María; Piñero-Pinto, Elena; Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Alvaro Manuel; Ruiz-Dorantes, Francisco Javier; Casaña, José

doi:10.3390/biomedicines11041175

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With regard to research methods, qualitative and quantitative research methods are divided, and most studies adopt qualitative research methods. In the quantitative studies, the web of science (WOS) database is analyzed by using advanced analysis tools [28] , e.g., CiteSpace software, HistCite software, Pajek software, etc. Accordingly, this paper attempts to analyze and discuss the relevant problems of medical AI research based on WOS publication data (2013-2023) and using CiteSpace, HistCite, and Pajek bibliometric and scientometric tools.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Scientometric Review of Medical Artificial Intelligence Research: From A Social Science Perspective

Liu,

2024

J Inform Anal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Along with the increasingly rapid development of digital technology and economy, medical treatment has been enhanced by artificial intelligence (AI). Studies have explored many topics in the field of medical AI. However, there is a lack of a systematic review of the overall research area of medical AI. In a visual way, this study uses quantitative analysis to systematically review the entire field and explore the current status and trends of medical AI research. Methods: This paper retrieves 692 papers on medical AI from Social Sciences Citation Index core database of the Web of Science from 2013 to 2023. Three bibliometric and network analysis tools, including CiteSpace, HistCite and Pajek, are used to identify the time-and-space knowledge map, research hotspots, emerging trends and primary path of medical AI research. Results: A co-word network of medical AI research reveals that the field focuses more on the topics of health care and cancer. The analysis of the burst literature indicates the research trends in the sub-sections such as medical ethics, neural network and precision medicine. The analysis of the main path draws the evolution track. Conclusion: The results of bibliometric analysis illustrate the current situation, past evolution and future trends of medical AI research, and identify hotspots and future research directions.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Scientometric Review of Medical Artificial Intelligence Research: From A Social Science Perspective

Liu,

2024

J Inform Anal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Escobio-Prieto et al assessed the use of DEXA vs. calcaneal QUS in a systematic review to determine and analyze the use of the latter in terms of bone disease prevention and diagnosis. They concluded that the calcaneal QUS tool may be a promising method to evaluate BMD in elderly people, facilitating its prevention and diagnosis [7].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%