2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-018-3101-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Uniform Propagation of Chaos for Maxwell Molecules

Abstract: We prove propagation of chaos at explicit polynomial rates in Wasserstein distance W 2 for Kac's N -particle system associated with the spatially homogeneous Boltzmann equation for Maxwell molecules. Our approach is mainly based on novel probabilistic coupling techniques. Combining them with recent stabilization results for the particle system we obtain, under suitable moments assumptions on the initial distribution, a uniform-in-time estimate of order almost N −1/3 for W 2 2 .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corresponding particle approximations (including a rate of convergence) was studied by Fournier, Mischler [FM16] for hard potentials and by Xu [Xu18] for soft potentials. Similar results for Maxwellian molecules, but with another particle system, were also obtained in [CF18]. The precise formulation of hard and soft potentials are introduced in the next section.…”
Section: The Enskog Processsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Corresponding particle approximations (including a rate of convergence) was studied by Fournier, Mischler [FM16] for hard potentials and by Xu [Xu18] for soft potentials. Similar results for Maxwellian molecules, but with another particle system, were also obtained in [CF18]. The precise formulation of hard and soft potentials are introduced in the next section.…”
Section: The Enskog Processsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…As remarked above, our estimates (Theorem 1.1, 1.3, 1.7) improve this rate; this improvement is due to the improvement of Theorem 1.6 over the corresponding estimate in [30], and this will be discussed further below. More recently, [8] proved a chaoticity estimate for Maxwell molecules in d = 3, measured in the L 2 (P) norm of Wasserstein 2 distance (1.16), and with an almost optimal rate N ǫ−1/3 , which is almost completely analagous to Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Probabilistic Techniques For the Kac Process And Boltzmann Ementioning
confidence: 84%
“…From existence and uniqueness, we can consider the Boltzmann equation as describing a non-linear semigroup of flow operators on (φ t ) t≥0 on ∪ k>2 S k . To prove Proposition 1, Norris [33] introduces a family of random linear operators E st , and develops a representation formula in terms of these operators, which will be reviewed in Sections 4,8. Cruicial to the proof are estimates for the operator norms of E st , which are obtained by Grönwallstyle estimates. As a result, the constant C depends badly on the terminal time t fin , with a priori exponential growth.…”
Section: Introduction and Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, Fournier-Mischler [13] proved the propagation of chaos at rate N −1/4 for the Nanbu system and for hard potentials without cutoff (γ ∈ [0, 1] and ν ∈ (0, 1)). Finally, as mentioned in Section 1.5, Cortez-Fontbona [4] used two coupling techniques for Kac's binary interaction system and obtained a uniform in time estimate for the Boltzmann equation with Maxwell molecules (γ = 0) under some suitable moments assumptions on the initial datum. Let us mention that the time-uniformity uses the recent nice results of Rousset [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus impossible to simulate it directly. For this reason, we will study a truncated version of Nanbu's particle system applying a cutoff procedure as [13], who were studying the Nanbu system for hard potentials and Maxwell molecules, and [4], who were dealing with the Kac system for Maxwell molecules. Our particle system with cutoff corresponds to the generator L N,K defined, for any bounded Lipschitz function φ : (R 3 ) N → R and v = (v 1 , ..., v N ) ∈ (R 3 ) N , by (1.12) with G defined by (1.4).…”
Section: The Particle Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%