2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative water content estimation in landfills through joint inversion of seismic refraction and electrical resistivity data considering surface conduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other attempts to predict permeability through TDIP data with different approaches used in recent years (e.g., Revil et al., 2020) required the estimation of petrophysical parameters such as cementation exponent and grain density. As these parameters are estimated through laboratory measurements on soil samples (Steiner et al., 2022), this method cannot be applied at the Circeo National Park, where drilling boreholes was unfeasible. Although the formation factor plays a critical role in the equations predicting hydraulic conductivity from IP measurements (Flores‐Orozco et al., 2022), it can be conveniently estimated in Equation (8) by the low‐frequency conductivity σ 0 (Weller et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other attempts to predict permeability through TDIP data with different approaches used in recent years (e.g., Revil et al., 2020) required the estimation of petrophysical parameters such as cementation exponent and grain density. As these parameters are estimated through laboratory measurements on soil samples (Steiner et al., 2022), this method cannot be applied at the Circeo National Park, where drilling boreholes was unfeasible. Although the formation factor plays a critical role in the equations predicting hydraulic conductivity from IP measurements (Flores‐Orozco et al., 2022), it can be conveniently estimated in Equation (8) by the low‐frequency conductivity σ 0 (Weller et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Steiner et al. (2022) jointly inverted seismic refraction and ERT data collected at high and low frequencies (i.e., induced polarization) to yield spatially continuous estimates of porosity, cation exchange capacity, and VWC. Garré et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, moisture estimates from surface-based electrical geophysical methods (e.g., FDEM and ERT) may be limited to a qualitative interpretation of approximate zones of relatively high/low moisture unless an acceptable means for estimating variability in petrophysical properties has been established. For example, Steiner et al (2022) jointly inverted seismic refraction and ERT data collected at high and low frequencies (i.e., induced polarization) to yield spatially continuous estimates of porosity, cation exchange capacity, and VWC. Garré et al (2011) performed an ERT-based moisture monitoring and root water uptake experiment on a soil monolith using detailed time-domain reflectometry data to characterize different soil horizons in the monolith to calibrate a Waxman and Smits (1968) petrophysical function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, assessing VWC from TL-ERT can be challenging due to the many physical parameters also affecting subsurface bulk EC (such as temperature, pore water EC, porosity, grain size distribution and mineralogy 50 , 51 ). In this context, some studies have assessed the accuracy of the ERT-predicted VWC, for example, by comparing them with conventional gravimetric methods applied on samples collected on the field 52 54 or hydrogeological data from sensors installed on the field 2 , 55 58 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%