Quantity and Quality of Economic Evaluations in U.S. Nursing Research, 1997–2015

Abstract

Background The United States has a complex healthcare system that is undergoing substantial reformations. There is a need for high-quality, economic evaluations of nursing practice. An updated review of completed economic evaluations relevant to the field of nursing within the U.S. healthcare system is timely and needed. Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate and describe the quantity and quality of economic evaluations in nursing-relevant research performed in the U.S. between 1997 and 2015. Methods Four databases were searched. Titles, abstracts, and full-text content were reviewed to identify studies that analyzed both costs and outcomes, relevant to nursing, performed in the U.S., and used the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) to measure effectiveness. For included studies, data were extracted from full-text articles using criteria from U.S. Public Health Service’s Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Results Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Most (n = 25, 89%) were published in the last decade of the analysis, from 2006 to 2015. Assessment of quality, based on selected items from the panel guidelines, found that the evaluations did not consistently use the recommended societal perspective, use multiple resource utilization categories, use constant dollars, discount future costs and outcomes, use a lifetime horizon, or include an indication of uncertainty in results. The only resource utilization category consistently included across studies was healthcare resources. Discussion Only 28 nursing-related studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified as meeting robust health economic evaluation methodological criteria, and most did not include all important guideline items. Despite increases in absolute numbers of published studies over the past decade, economic evaluation has been underutilized in U.S. nursing-relevant research in the past two decades.

Analysis and Improvement of Nursing Quality Based on Standardized Information Integration

“…At present, Chinese hospitals are vigorously developing informatization construction so that informatization can better serve patients. erefore, in the informatization construction, a series of models, application strategies, and methods have been formed [12]. "Hospital information platform based on electronic medical records" refers to the medical information sharing and business cooperation platform connecting clinical information system and management information system based on information collection, storage, and centralized management of patient electronic medical records [13].…”

Nursing research priorities based on CINAHL database: A scoping review

“…Nursing science researchers are of the opinion that more randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, meta‐synthesis, experimental and intervention studies are needed (Baldi et al, ; Richards, Coulthard, & Borglin, ). In addition, research that is more robust is required when measuring outcomes of nursing interventions, whereas methodological rigour is warranted when conducting economic evaluations in nursing (Cook, Morrison, Eaton, Theodore, & Doorenbos, ). Cook et al () highlighted that it is critical to show the value of nursing through high‐quality and well‐designed economic evaluation research.…”

“…In addition, research that is more robust is required when measuring outcomes of nursing interventions, whereas methodological rigour is warranted when conducting economic evaluations in nursing (Cook, Morrison, Eaton, Theodore, & Doorenbos, ). Cook et al () highlighted that it is critical to show the value of nursing through high‐quality and well‐designed economic evaluation research. More importance should also be attached to the appropriate methods of conducting evidence‐based nursing research (Zhao et al, ).…”

Financial competencies as investigated in the nursing field: Findings of a scoping review

“…Despite the recognized relevance of the financial issues in the health care (Erjavec & Starc, 2017 ; Scoble & Russell, 2003 ) and also in the nursing sector (Bai et al, 2017 ; Cook et al, 2017 ), only a few studies have been published to date in this field, less than one per year in the last 25 years. The limited power given to nurses (McMillan & Perron, 2020 ) and the influence of some stereotypes regarding their higher interpersonal skills when compared with doctors, who are perceived as having high power and being strong leaders (Braithwaite et al, 2016 ), might have left this area of investigation out of the nursing discipline.…”