2013
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9716-44-38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantity of virulent fowl adenovirus serotype 1 correlates with clinical signs, macroscopical and pathohistological lesions in gizzards following experimental induction of gizzard erosion in broilers

Abstract: In the present study day-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) and commercial broilers with maternally derived fowl adenovirus serotype 1 (FAdV-1) antibodies were orally infected with a European “pathogenic” FAdV-1, isolated from broilers showing signs of gizzard erosion. During the experiment, broilers were observed and weighed daily up to 17 days post infection (dpi). Clinically, both infected groups showed significant decrease of weight compared to respective negative control groups. Birds were examined by necro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
17
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cook et al [3] indicated that the replication rate of adenovirus strains reached a peak in the first three weeks postinfection and that those strains had a higher degree of tropism for the digestive tract than for other internal organs. Similar results were obtained by other authors [9,10,30], also showing that the rate of replication of strain FAdV-1/A is highest in the gizzard, liver, spleen, and intestine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Cook et al [3] indicated that the replication rate of adenovirus strains reached a peak in the first three weeks postinfection and that those strains had a higher degree of tropism for the digestive tract than for other internal organs. Similar results were obtained by other authors [9,10,30], also showing that the rate of replication of strain FAdV-1/A is highest in the gizzard, liver, spleen, and intestine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These findings, together with the fact that FAdV-1 was detectable in the gizzard, but not in the liver (with the exception of one bird during the incubation stage), suggests that the epithelial lining of the gizzard, and perhaps also of the remaining sections of the alimentary tract, may serve as a reservoir of FAdV and play a role in transmission by shedding it long after typical liver lesions have resolved. Interestingly, this is consistent with pathogenic FAdV-1 strains that can induce gizzard erosions in chickens (Grafl et al, 2013), as well as some human adenoviruses that specifically attach to and infect epithelial cells of the alimentary system (Favier et al, 2004). In a previous study, following ocular inoculation with FAdV-8 at a similar age but with a higher dose of virus than that used in this study, viral antigens were detected in the epithelial cells of the intestine up to 13 days PI, but only low levels of antigen were detected in the proventriculus in a small proportion of birds between 2 and 5 days PI (Saifuddin & Wilks, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The FAdV-1 isolate used in our study was included since it was the only contemporary FAdV-1 isolate available in Australia and its pathogenicity and role in IBH outbreaks in Australia were unknown. The contrast in pathogenicity of the FAdV-1 isolate used here and that of the ones examined by other workers (Okuda et al, 2001;Domanska-Blicharz et al, 2011;Lim et al, 2012;Grafl et al, 2013) was highlighted in our study. Interestingly, some strains of FAdV-8 have been implicated in cases with both gizzard erosions and IBH (Okuda et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A presumptive diagnosis is confirmed by virological and/or histological investigations. Experimental infection of specific pathogen-free (SPF) chickens with Asian and European FAdV-1 field isolates was successful in reproducing AGE (Okuda et al, 2001a, b;Nakamura et al, 2002;Domanska-Blicharz et al, 2011;Grafl et al, 2013). Furthermore, studies have investigated a number of factors that may influence the development of AGE, such as type or age of birds, and their immune status (Okuda et al, 2001a, b;Muroga et al, 2006;Grafl et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%