2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00138-018-0911-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantization-based Markov feature extraction method for image splicing detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods based on the picture essence properties, 5 8 imaging device attributes, 9 11 image compression attributes, 12 14 and hash techniques 15 , 16 can be broadly characterized as the four categories of traditional image splicing forgery detection methods. However, the four methods listed above have some drawbacks regarding forgery detection, such as the following: (1) the image essence attribute approach may not work for an overall processed image that has been blurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods based on the picture essence properties, 5 8 imaging device attributes, 9 11 image compression attributes, 12 14 and hash techniques 15 , 16 can be broadly characterized as the four categories of traditional image splicing forgery detection methods. However, the four methods listed above have some drawbacks regarding forgery detection, such as the following: (1) the image essence attribute approach may not work for an overall processed image that has been blurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, identifying the different statistical characteristics of the parts of a tampered image is the basis for detecting or localizing image splicing. Splicing detection [5][6][7][8][9][10] can determine whether a given image is authentic or tampered. In practical forensic applications, localizing splicing regions [11][12][13] compared with splicing detection is more effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Author Name: Preparation of Papers for IEEE Access (May 2019)9 VOLUME XX, 2019C. QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu yüzden internet üzerinden rastgele elde edilen görüntülerin orijinalliğinin denetlenmesinde aktif yöntemler yetersiz kalmaktadır. Kopyala-yapıştır [6,7] ve ekleme [8] gibi pasif görüntü sahteciliği tespiti yöntemlerinde ise herhangi bir ek bilgiye ihtiyaç duyulmaksızın görüntü özellikleri çıkartılarak sahtecilik tespiti yapılmaktadır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified