2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-014-5992-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum cascade laser-based MIR spectrometer for the determination of CO and $$\hbox {CO}_2$$ CO 2 concentrations and temperature in flames

Abstract: and nondestructive, are an ideal choice for many flame applications. While many important radicals such as OH and CH have strong absorption bands in the UV/Vis and can easily be detected using techniques such as LIF or CRDS, electronic transitions of stable molecules like CO and CO 2 lie in the deep UV. Detection schemes like twophoton LIF [1] are possible, but quantification is prone to errors. For these molecules, rovibrational transitions in the infrared provide an alternative detection method. Due to the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare the flame center temperatures at a distance of 15 mm above the burner surface with temperatures previously measured with CARS [22,23] the measured line-of-sight spectra were Abelinverted using the method of Dasch [24] prior to fitting the absorption spectrum. Details of the procedure are provided in [25,26]. Temperatures agree very well within the measurement uncertainty of 2-3 % for the absorption measurements and 2.5 % for CARS ( fig.…”
Section: A Sensor Validationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…To compare the flame center temperatures at a distance of 15 mm above the burner surface with temperatures previously measured with CARS [22,23] the measured line-of-sight spectra were Abelinverted using the method of Dasch [24] prior to fitting the absorption spectrum. Details of the procedure are provided in [25,26]. Temperatures agree very well within the measurement uncertainty of 2-3 % for the absorption measurements and 2.5 % for CARS ( fig.…”
Section: A Sensor Validationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Figure 2 summarizes some representative results from a number of sensor development and implementation studies in terms of detection limits and bandwidths. It compares species concentration measurements in a variety of combustion systems including laboratory environments [1,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22], shock tube studies [23][24][25][26][27][28], industry processes [29][30][31][32][33], and engines [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. For the purpose of making a direct comparison between different studies, the reported absolute minimal detection limits for several commonly probed species in combustion, including CO, CO 2 , H 2 O, and C 2 H 2 , are plotted on the same diagram against detection bandwidths.…”
Section: Sensor Design Targets and Measurement Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model calculation were performed using cantera[32] and the combustion model of Zhao et al [33]. The temperature profile was measured using CO and CO 2 lines at 4.48 µm with a QCL [25]. An error of 5 % is estimated for the temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, g(ν) can be well described by a Voigt function [24] with the Doppler broadening being the dominant contribution in the low pressure flames investigated here and pressure broadening playing only a minor role. More details of the experimental setup and the data evaluation procedure for the QCL measurements may be found in a recent publication [25].…”
Section: Qcl Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%