2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1070428011030043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum-chemical calculations of NMR chemical shifts of organic molecules: II. Influence of medium, relativistic effects, and vibrational corrections on phosphorus magnetic shielding constants in the simplest phosphines and phosphine chalcogenides

Abstract: The influence of solvent nature, relativistic effects, and vibrational corrections on the accuracy of calculation of 31 P chemical shifts of the simplest phosphines, phosphine oxides, phosphine sulfides, and phosphine selenides was studied. Consideration of the above factors at the stage of both geometry optimization and calculation of magnetic shielding constants was found to appreciably improve the accuracy of calculation of 31 P NMR chemical shifts in the series of phosphines and phosphine chalcogenides. * … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most likely, that is because of effects of the environment (especially taking into account that the compound exists as anion in the solution) which may have a great impact on 13 P NMR shifts [41,42]. Another possible reason is that we do not take into account Table 1 Spin-spin coupling J P,Se for selenides of some phosphines characterizing the donor-acceptor properties vibrational corrections, which also affect NMR shifts [41,43]. These effects may also be the reason why calculated J P,C and J P,H spin-spin constants are that different from the experimental values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most likely, that is because of effects of the environment (especially taking into account that the compound exists as anion in the solution) which may have a great impact on 13 P NMR shifts [41,42]. Another possible reason is that we do not take into account Table 1 Spin-spin coupling J P,Se for selenides of some phosphines characterizing the donor-acceptor properties vibrational corrections, which also affect NMR shifts [41,43]. These effects may also be the reason why calculated J P,C and J P,H spin-spin constants are that different from the experimental values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this work, the 31 P NMR shielding constants were calculated in terms of the density functional theory (DFT) using B3LYP functional [6,7] according to the gauge-including atomic orbital (GIAO) approach [8]. We previously found [1] that relativistic effects are crucial in the calculations of δ P for molecules containing 3rd and larger Period elements [1]. For instance, the spin-orbital contribution to δ P for trimethylphosphine sulfide and trimethylphosphine selenide attains 10 and 40 ppm, respectively.…”
Section: Z-iimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present communication continues the series of studies involving ab initio calculations on shielding constants [1,5]; in this work we examined effects of intramolecular coordination of the phosphorus atom in trichloro[2-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)ethenyl]phosphonium hexachlorophosphate(V) (I) and 1,1,1,1-tetrachloro-1H-1λ 6 -pyrazolo[1,2-a][1,2,3]diazaphosphol-8-ium-1-ide (II). Phosphorylation of 1-vinyl-1H-pyrazole with PCl 5 gave Z isomer of salt I, which was stable at room temperature; it underwent Z-E isomerization at elevated temperature (Scheme 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations