2009 13th International Workshop on Computational Electronics 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iwce.2009.5091140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Confined Stark Shift and Ground State Optical Transition Rate in [100] Laterally Biased InAs/GaAs Quantum Dots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, where H is single particle tight binding Hamiltonian, E 2or3or4 are electron states, H 1 is the top most valence band hole state, and is position vector along the polarization direction of the incident light [32,[39][40][41]. Figure 3 Figure 3(e) compares the calculated optical strengths from NEMO 3D simulator including the piezoelectric effects with the experimental measurements.…”
Section: With Piezoelectricity  One Anticrossing In the Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, where H is single particle tight binding Hamiltonian, E 2or3or4 are electron states, H 1 is the top most valence band hole state, and is position vector along the polarization direction of the incident light [32,[39][40][41]. Figure 3 Figure 3(e) compares the calculated optical strengths from NEMO 3D simulator including the piezoelectric effects with the experimental measurements.…”
Section: With Piezoelectricity  One Anticrossing In the Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where H is single particle tight binding Hamiltonian, E 2or3or4 are electron states, H 1 is the top most valence band hole state, and is position vector along the polarization direction of the incident light [32,[39][40][41]. Figure 3 , where and are the transition rate intensities of (E 2 ,H 1 ) , (E 3 ,H 1 ) and (E 4 ,H 1 ), respectively corresponding to the figure 3(b) in the experimental field range.…”
Section: With Piezoelectricity  One Anticrossing In the Experimental...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atoms at the surface are passivated according to our published approach. 36 The inter-band optical transition strengths between the electron-hole energy states are computed using Fermi's golden rule by squared absolute value of the momentum matrix elements summed over spin degenerate states: 41,52 …”
Section: Electronic and Optical Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a typical single InAs QD, the T rans e dependence on the electric field is parabolic [29,51], indicating a large magnitude for the polarizibility β and a very small magnitude for the dipole moment ρ -a direct consequence of the small space available for the electron and hole separation. For QD stacks, made up of a large number of QD layers, electric fields are capable of pushing electron and hole wave functions far away from each other (even at the opposite ends of the stack for large fields), and therefore can lead to large separations between the electron and hole wave functions.…”
Section: − Transition Energies and Band-gap Wavelengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such fields are either present internally such as investigated recently for the solar cells [25,26], or can be applied externally to purposely tune the properties of the devices for a certain operation [14]. Although the impact of electric fields has been extensively studied in the literature for the single QDs [27][28][29], the bi-layer QDMs [7,[30][31][32][33][34], and for the small QD stacks consisting of three to four QD layers [35], to-date no theoretical understanding is available on the electronic and optical properties of the multi-layer QDMs under the influence of electrical fields.…”
Section: − Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%